Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better handle admin handler stream replication API lifecycle #4647

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023
Merged

Better handle admin handler stream replication API lifecycle #4647

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

wxing1292
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?

  • Better handle admin handler stream replication API lifecycle

Why?
Make sure admin handler stream replication API is able to return if client -> server or server -> client link breaks

How did you test it?
UT

Potential risks
N/A

Is hotfix candidate?
Yes

@wxing1292 wxing1292 requested a review from yux0 July 18, 2023 21:58
@wxing1292 wxing1292 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2023 21:58
@wxing1292 wxing1292 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2023 22:34
@wxing1292 wxing1292 merged commit bf23997 into temporalio:master Jul 19, 2023
@wxing1292 wxing1292 deleted the admin branch July 19, 2023 00:32
wxing1292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
Make sure admin handler stream replication API is able to return if client -> server or server -> client link breaks
dnr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Make sure admin handler stream replication API is able to return if client -> server or server -> client link breaks
dnr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Make sure admin handler stream replication API is able to return if client -> server or server -> client link breaks
dnr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Make sure admin handler stream replication API is able to return if client -> server or server -> client link breaks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants