Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: prefixes image names with ko:// scheme #2216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2020

Conversation

poy
Copy link
Contributor

@poy poy commented Mar 11, 2020

Changes

Prefixes image names with ko:// scheme. This allows ko to improve the experience with Go modules. See ko-build/ko#58 for more information.

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

This allows `ko` to improve the experience with Go modules. See
ko-build/ko#58 for more information.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from dibyom and imjasonh March 11, 2020 23:16
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Mar 11, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 11, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @poy. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 11, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prefixes image names with ko:// scheme. This allows ko to improve the experience with Go modules. See google/ko#58 for more information.

I am interested into know how it improves the experience 👼.

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ spec:
serviceAccountName: tekton-pipelines-controller
containers:
- name: tekton-pipelines-controller
image: github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/cmd/controller
image: ko://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/cmd/controller
args: [
"-kubeconfig-writer-image", "github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/cmd/kubeconfigwriter",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't thoses (all starting with github.com/tektoncd/pipeline) also be prefixed ?

@imjasonh
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

The improvement is from making typos less difficult to debug.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 17, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

@imjasonh could there be a strict way with this, as : in a "strict mode" you would get an error if a ko:// reference is missing from what ko gathered to build the image for. Would it be possible to have that ? (because otherwise, it will fail silently, right ? and will have an ErrPull… on the pod(s))

@imjasonh
Copy link
Member

If I'm understanding, yes that's exactly what ko does with this prefix. If it sees the special prefix in normal mode it strips it (for recent versions of ko in the last 6? months). If you pass --strict then it strips the ko:// prefix and fails if the import path isn't recognized, instead of passing it through, which leads to unpullable image references.

This is step one to adopting ko strict more. After this we can run ko with --strict to avoid bad refs.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

If I'm understanding, yes that's exactly what ko does with this prefix. If it sees the special prefix in normal mode it strips it (for recent versions of ko in the last 6? months). If you pass --strict then it strips the ko:// prefix and fails if the import path isn't recognized, instead of passing it through, which leads to unpullable image references.

This is step one to adopting ko strict more. After this we can run ko with --strict to avoid bad refs.

Alright, if it works like this, it sounds good to me 👍
/lgtm

/cc @afrittoli @bobcatfish

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2020
@dibyom
Copy link
Member

dibyom commented Mar 18, 2020

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 18, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/hold

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 18, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/pull/2216/files/f7442117ba4f54a884173bebb06ff542e7bc6ffe#diff-d56e306ce931c2991f18ef68b6b501a3 needs to be taken into account 👼

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel
I'll follow-up on this

@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 1, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit c903e5d into tektoncd:master Apr 1, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli added the kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. label Apr 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants