-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Preset] include sourcekit-inproc in default install on Linux #8189
[Preset] include sourcekit-inproc in default install on Linux #8189
Conversation
@swift-ci please test |
There's no particular reason why this can't be done, but I haven't tested it yet with one of the build presets that packages up the instance. I'll try and build this tomorrow on my Ubuntu and Darwin boxes to verify that it doesn't have any unforseen issues. |
Ah, we should configure |
I added a commit that configure |
@swift-ci please test
|
As a result of doing some verifications, I came to the conclusion that I can not use it as it is.
It seems necessary to change the installation destination on Linux. |
There's probably an easy fix somewhere to solve the installation path without needing a symlink. I'll have a look and see but if you can find/test as well that would be great.
Alex
Sent from my iPhone 📱
… On 29 Mar 2017, at 08:50, Norio Nomura ***@***.***> wrote:
As a result of doing some verifications, I came to the conclusion that I can not use it as it is.
The following workarounds seem to be necessary for proper operation.
ln -s /usr/lib/sourcekitdInProc.framework/sourcekitdInProc /usr/lib/libsourcekitdInProc.so
It seems necessary to change the installation destination on Linux.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Not in |
https://github.com/norio-nomura/swift/tree/enable-sourcekit-test
|
I added norio-nomura@d9a7f49 renaming to |
Opened #8485 |
d0ad99a
to
28b2dc9
Compare
Adjusted rpath that assuming |
@swift-ci please smoke test |
@alblue What else is needed to advance this PR? |
Can we rebase the change against master to check it applies, and then we can kick off tests again?
Alex
Sent from my iPhone 📱
…
|
28b2dc9
to
a93bddf
Compare
rebased. |
@swift-CIA please smoke test |
@swift-ci please smoke test |
Can we retry test? |
@swift-ci please clean smoke test Linux platform |
Can we retry? |
I think that failed test is not related to my changes… |
I think you can test it, but merging with the latest tag instead of with
the latest commit.
…On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:26 AM Norio Nomura ***@***.***> wrote:
I think that failed test is not related to my changes…
https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-Linux-smoke-test/7184/consoleFull#708282560ee1a197b-acac-4b17-83cf-a53b95139a76
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8189 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALNBJx9N3gvhgDUrxBdvEmFr7AkV8e-6ks5r0rvXgaJpZM4MhsnQ>
.
|
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform |
Yay! 🙌 Thanks! 🙏 |
🎉🎉🎉
Awesome!
…On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:02 AM Norio Nomura ***@***.***> wrote:
Yay! 🙌 Thanks! 🙏
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8189 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALNBJxfjX5vNVTSjmz57Mk1Lkjdz7kFcks5r0vyfgaJpZM4MhsnQ>
.
|
Resolves SR-3699.
Is there any reason to not do this yet?