-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reload a file when other files within the same module or a .swiftmodule
file has been changed
#1180
Merged
ahoppen
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
ahoppen:refresh-file-on-updated-dependencies
Apr 24, 2024
Merged
Reload a file when other files within the same module or a .swiftmodule
file has been changed
#1180
ahoppen
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
ahoppen:refresh-file-on-updated-dependencies
Apr 24, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@swift-ci Please test |
2b78854
to
ed3539a
Compare
@swift-ci Please test |
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
@swift-ci Please test macOS |
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
bnbarham
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
…ule` file has been changed When the client sends us `workspace/didChangeWatchedFiles` notification of an updated `.swift` file, we should refresh the other open files in that module since they might be referencing functions from that updated file. If a `.swiftmodule` file has been updated, we refresh all the files within the package since they might import that module. Technically, we would only need to refresh files that are in module that are downstream of the updated module but we don’t currently have that information easily available from SwiftPM. Also, usually, if the client has a file from a low-level module open, he’ll be working on that module which means that such an optimization won’t help. The real solution here is to wait for us to finish preparation (which we would exactly know when it finishes since sourcekit-lsp would schedule it) but for that we need to implement background preparation. Fixes swiftlang#620 Fixes swiftlang#1116 rdar://99329579 rdar://123971779
ed3539a
to
fd7b268
Compare
@swift-ci Please test |
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the client sends us
workspace/didChangeWatchedFiles
notification of an updated.swift
file, we should refresh the other open files in that module since they might be referencing functions from that updated file.If a
.swiftmodule
file has been updated, we refresh all the files within the package since they might import that module. Technically, we would only need to refresh files that are in module that are downstream of the updated module but we don’t currently have that information easily available from SwiftPM. Also, usually, if the client has a file from a low-level module open, he’ll be working on that module which means that such an optimization won’t help. The real solution here is to wait for us to finish preparation (which we would exactly know when it finishes since sourcekit-lsp would schedule it) but for that we need to implement background preparation.Fixes #620
Fixes #1116
rdar://99329579
rdar://123971779