Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.html -> .svelte #2071

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 9, 2019
Merged

.html -> .svelte #2071

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 9, 2019

Conversation

Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 8, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2071 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2071   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files           1       1           
  Lines          48      49    +1     
======================================
+ Hits           48      49    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
register.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update da11d75...e6ed8ef. Read the comment docs.

@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris changed the title [WIP] .html -> .svelte .html -> .svelte Feb 9, 2019
@Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member Author

Switched a couple of apps over (including v3.svelte.technology), updated the templates, and everything seems to continue to work, with either .html or .svelte extensions (though the REPL will automatically interpret .html files in gists as .svelte — seemed like the only practical way, even though it will mean cases where import declarations reference .html files that apparently don't exist), so... I guess it's time to pull the trigger?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants