This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
motorway_link should have color used by motorway and trunk #103
Comments
Agree
Am 24. August 2021 10:58:21 MESZ schrieb Mateusz Konieczny ***@***.***>:
…Right now it looks silly and like wrong OSM data and on zooming out it
seems that there are gaps in case of T junctions
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.0129/20.0638
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5402f/5402f8ecb1399ae0c10e7c7be912661c7d454421" alt="screen02"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa5ba/fa5ba7d1c419d50524ac31760c8a691136074a31" alt="Screenshot_20210824-102613"
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#103
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
|
I am unsure whether it might be a good idea to also display them using a smaller width. IMO this looks good for connections between motorways/trunks and other roads, but connections between motorways and other motorways may look odd in some cases, especially as these connecting roads often consist of more than one lane. Motorway connecting with a different roadMotorway connecting with another motorway |
I thikn that's ok. Slip roads are far more frequent than motorway links. |
smaller width looks weird on T-shaped motorway junctions, but on far more often slip roads wide _link looks extremely bad (based on provided examples) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Right now it looks silly and like wrong OSM data and on zooming out it seems that there are gaps in case of T junctions
Probably trunk_link is also affected
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.0129/20.0638
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: