Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR: Gracefully handle ValueError in DataFrameModel #4142

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2017

Conversation

jitseniesen
Copy link
Member

This handles the case where the data frame contains a NaN and the user specifies the format %d. Fixes #4139.

@goanpeca goanpeca self-requested a review February 13, 2017 21:36
@goanpeca
Copy link
Member

@ccordoba12 should we made this fix against 3.x ? or ?

@jitseniesen
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I wanted this to go against 3.1.x ... wait a minute ...

@jitseniesen jitseniesen changed the base branch from master to 3.1.x February 13, 2017 21:39
@jitseniesen
Copy link
Member Author

jitseniesen commented Feb 13, 2017

This is ready as far as I am concerned. No idea what is happening with the tests.

@ccordoba12 ?

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 added this to the v3.1.3 milestone Feb 13, 2017
@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

@jitseniesen, I introduced new tests for the main window last week and they are failing sometimes. I'm still trying to determine what tests need to be disabled in what Cis.

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 changed the title Gracefully handle ValueError in DataFrameModel PR: Gracefully handle ValueError in DataFrameModel Feb 14, 2017
@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 merged commit 22cbe2f into spyder-ide:3.1.x Feb 14, 2017
ccordoba12 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
ccordoba12 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
@jitseniesen jitseniesen deleted the issue-4139 branch September 29, 2017 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants