Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve Go To Definition to bean definitions in @ConditionalOnBean and @ConditionalOnMissingBean #1381

Closed
martinlippert opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode type: enhancement

Comments

@martinlippert
Copy link
Member

Various smaller improvements to implement:

  • include @ConditionalOnMissingBean in ConditionalOnBeanDefinitionProvider
  • focus on attributes with name name (do not try to find beans for other attributes, like type)
  • support bean names defined in arrays
@martinlippert martinlippert added type: enhancement for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode labels Oct 10, 2024
@martinlippert martinlippert added this to the 4.26.0.RELEASE milestone Oct 10, 2024
@martinlippert martinlippert self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
martinlippert added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
… in name attribute, and support value arrays
@martinlippert
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed with 54d7ee4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant