Fix #4230: slowdown in writing document with sphinx 1.6 #4523
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tk0miya
force-pushed
the
4230_tuning_sphinx
branch
from
c2cfcc4 to
f815b67
Compare
``docutils.utils.new_document()`` is much slower than an instantiation of document node. This adds a much faster alternative of the function which uses caches internally.
tk0miya
force-pushed
the
4230_tuning_sphinx
branch
from
f815b67 to
c9f511a
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
docutils.utils.new_document()is much slower than an instantiationof document node. This adds a much faster alternative of the function
which uses caches internally.
refs: #4230