Skip to content

Use PosixRename for sftpfs #437

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonathan-conder
Copy link

OpenSSH 4.8 added POSIX-style renames as a protocol extension [1]. The sftp library supports the extension, on both the client and server side, since version 1.13 [2].

For consistency with the other filesystems, it makes sense to use POSIX renames for sftpfs. The old-style rename does not overwrite existing files, which makes it difficult to implement atomic file writes.

[1] https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-4.8
[2] pkg/sftp#384

OpenSSH 4.8 added POSIX-style renames as a protocol extension [1]. The
sftp library supports the extension, on both the client and server side,
since version 1.13 [2].

For consistency with the other filesystems, it makes sense to use POSIX
renames for sftpfs. The old-style rename does not overwrite existing
files, which makes it difficult to implement atomic file writes.

[1] https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-4.8
[2] pkg/sftp#384
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 6, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants