JP-3585: remove deprecated datamodel types

[emolter]

Resolves JP-3585

Closes #8382

This PR enforces removal of the deprecated stdatamodels model types DrizProductModel, MIRIRampModel, and MultiProductModel. Most of the changes are in stdatamodels; see PR here. On the jwst side, the only change is to remove the model types from the deprecated list.

Checklist for maintainers

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[braingram]

The corresponding stdatamodels changes have been merged into main: spacetelescope/stdatamodels#171

Anything I can do to help bring this out of draft?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.78%. Comparing base (2fb073e) to head (b4de8c3).
Report is 25 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head b4de8c3 differs from pull request most recent head bb9fa07. Consider uploading reports for the commit bb9fa07 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8388      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.31%   75.78%   +0.47%     
==========================================
  Files         474      476       +2     
  Lines       38965    39450     +485     
==========================================
+ Hits        29345    29896     +551     
+ Misses       9620     9554      -66     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	77.65% <ø> (+0.31%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 2fb073e

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[emolter]

The corresponding stdatamodels changes have been merged into main: spacetelescope/stdatamodels#171

Anything I can do to help bring this out of draft?

I just added the changelog entry and moved it out of draft. It would be helpful if you could review it!
Regression tests started here.

[braingram]

Thanks for making the changes!

Assuming the regtests don't reveal any surprises this looks good to me.

[hbushouse]

Failures in regtest run are unrelated. Everything looks good here.