JP-1848: Schema updates for new and modified keywords

[hbushouse]

Update datamodels schemas for all keyword changes documented in JP-1799, in order to keep our schemas in sync with the Keyword Dictionary.

Fixes #5610
Fixes JP-1848
Fixes JP-1849

[hbushouse]

When merged this will of course cause horrific numbers of failures in regression tests, due to keyword changes that will affect the headers of nearly every product created.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5618 (22a41be) into master (2bbb677) will decrease coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5618      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.44%   74.13%   -0.32%     
==========================================
  Files         416      416              
  Lines       38199    38380     +181     
  Branches     5201     5201              
==========================================
+ Hits        28438    28452      +14     
- Misses       9761     9928     +167     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	75.98% <100.00%> (ø)		Carriedforward from 0d2e34e
unit	54.14% <0.00%> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jwst/cube_build/ifu_cube.py	68.16% <80.00%> (-8.53%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2bbb677...22a41be. Read the comment docs.

[jdavies-st]

Looks good. I doubt this will have any effect on our regression tests, given the keywords involved and that we're simply expanding the enum for some more commonly-used ones.

[hbushouse]

Looks good. I doubt this will have any effect on our regression tests, given the keywords involved and that we're simply expanding the enum for some more commonly-used ones.

Unfortunately there's at least 1 existing keyword that has had a slight modification to its comment/title field, so I suspect that will in fact lead to many failures. But hey, that's what okify_regtests is for, right?