You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
metadata.rb lists the chef-provisioning cookbook as a dependency. But it seems like the only relation to chef-provisioning is that it is a recommended way to use consul-cookbook (via cluster.rb). Indeed the Usage docs for consul:
does not use the chef-provisioning cookbook -- it uses a simple gem install. So it seems odd to make installing the chef-provisioning cookbook a requirement for using consul-cookbook.
If suggests is broken, perhaps there is an alternative keyword like recommends that would work instead? Or maybe the chef-provisioning cookbook doesn't belong in metadata.rb at all?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dpkp
changed the title
Is chef-provisioning a dependency?
Is the chef-provisioning cookbook a dependency?
Mar 7, 2015
metadata.rb lists the chef-provisioning cookbook as a dependency. But it seems like the only relation to chef-provisioning is that it is a recommended way to use consul-cookbook (via cluster.rb). Indeed the Usage docs for consul:
does not use the chef-provisioning cookbook -- it uses a simple gem install. So it seems odd to make installing the chef-provisioning cookbook a requirement for using consul-cookbook.
If
suggests
is broken, perhaps there is an alternative keyword likerecommends
that would work instead? Or maybe the chef-provisioning cookbook doesn't belong in metadata.rb at all?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: