Synonym tests #355
Merged
Synonym tests #355
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi Tim. instead of creating new databases, just add your tables to the standard efrpg database. |
|
Hi Simon, The reason for the seperate database is because the SQL for the synonyms needs to specifcally cater for objects which exist in another database, so I want to make sure that this is tested correctly. Aside from the extra database the synonyms have been created in, there is no need for any more. |
|
Released in v2.35.0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In preparation for more development on synonyms I have added a test class to cover current synonym functionality.
I have updated the test database creation scripts to create a new database containing synonyms pointing back to the current test database.
So far the only synonym test is to query a synonym.