-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate .status.succeeded and .status.reason #674
Deprecate .status.succeeded and .status.reason #674
Conversation
We have an api-change label ... I would classify deprecation of fields in the api change category, even if the fields are not actually removed yet. I added the label, but did not remove the cleanup label (though maybe we could). Conversely if there is consensus disagreement on my take, I don't feel strongly enough to argue much. Thoughts? |
/approve I'll defer on lgtm to let a non-RH'er chime in for "multi-org" agreement. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Jason Hall <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
A step toward #517 -- if people are okay with this we can remove it in the next release (v0.5.0)
Changes
Marks
.status.succeeded
and.status.reason
asDeprecated
, updates some doc comments I noticed while I was in the area./kind cleanup
Submitter Checklist
See the contributor guide
for details on coding conventions, github and prow interactions, and the code review process.
Release Notes