Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add retl schema breakdown #7469

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

Add retl schema breakdown #7469

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

charholt
Copy link
Contributor

Adding __reverse_etl schema info to public docs

Proposed changes

Merge timing

Related issues (optional)

Adding __reverse_etl schema info to public docs
@charholt charholt requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2025 19:25
@@ -16,6 +16,34 @@ For Segment to compute the data changes within your warehouse, Segment needs to
> warning ""
> There may be cost implications to having Segment query your warehouse tables.

## Reverse ETL Schema
When using Reverse ETL with Segment, several system tables are created within the `__segment_reverse_etl` schema in your Snowflake instance. These tables are crucial for managing the sync process efficiently and tracking state information. Below are the details of the system tables in this schema:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @charholt - is this content specific to Snowflake, or does this schema get created in every warehouse source?

If it's specific to Snowflake I can relocate this section to the Snowflake-specific setup page! https://segment.com/docs/connections/reverse-etl/reverse-etl-source-setup-guides/snowflake-setup/

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi! No, it is all the warehouse. thanks for catching this! I've removed snowflake and wrote warehouse instead.

removed snowflake
@forstisabella forstisabella merged commit a8b5a9d into develop Mar 21, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@forstisabella forstisabella deleted the charholt-patch-1 branch March 21, 2025 13:47
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request is merged, but may take a day or two to appear on the site.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants