Set an explicit key for gcs-service-account-credentials secret in e2e scripts #2039
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scylla-operator-bot
bot
added
the
kind/machinery
scylla-operator-bot
bot
added
the
priority/important-longterm
scylla-operator-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
scylla-operator-bot
bot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rzetelskik, tnozicka The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
scylla-operator-bot
bot
added
the
approved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes: This PR modifies the gcs-service-account-credentials secret creation kubectl command by giving it an explicit key so that the credentials file passed through SO_GCS_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_CREDENTIALS_PATH doesn't have to have a matching name. This is helpful for local development.
Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #
/kind machinery
/priority important-longterm