Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove pre-rollout check validating ScyllaDB version #2035

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator

@zimnx zimnx commented Jul 23, 2024

Description of your changes:

Minimal versions which this check validated are already EOL, and we don't claim we support them in our documentation.

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #2034

@zimnx zimnx added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Jul 23, 2024
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 23, 2024
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2024
@zimnx zimnx force-pushed the remove-prerollout-check branch 2 times, most recently from dafb557 to 42318e6 Compare July 23, 2024 21:30
Copy link
Contributor

@tnozicka tnozicka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't you remove this as well?

// Exposing requires ReplacingNodeUsingHostID, so minimal values should be the same.
ExposingScyllaClusterViaServiceOtherThanClusterIP: {
openSource: semver.MustParse("5.2.0"),
enterprise: semver.MustParse("2023.1.0"),
},

ExposingScyllaClusterViaServiceOtherThanClusterIP ScyllaFeature = "ExposingScyllaClusterViaServiceOtherThanClusterIP"

Minimal versions which this check validated are already EOL, and we don't claim we support them in our documentation.
@zimnx zimnx force-pushed the remove-prerollout-check branch from 42318e6 to a361077 Compare July 24, 2024 09:22
@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented Jul 24, 2024

shouldn't you remove this as well?

yep, removed.

Copy link
Member

@rzetelskik rzetelskik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm
/assign tnozicka

Copy link
Contributor

@tnozicka tnozicka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm
thanks

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rzetelskik, tnozicka, zimnx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot merged commit 9ed2ad5 into scylladb:master Jul 24, 2024
12 checks passed
@zimnx zimnx deleted the remove-prerollout-check branch July 24, 2024 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove pre-rollout check validating if Scylla supports HostID based node replacement
3 participants