Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Review the doc comments for consistency in formatting #183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

scouten
Copy link
Owner

@scouten scouten commented Jan 7, 2025

No description provided.

@scouten scouten self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #183 will not alter performance

Comparing doc-formatting (c38cbff) with main (18ac4c2)

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.99%. Comparing base (18ac4c2) to head (c38cbff).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   11.99%   11.99%           
=======================================
  Files         227      227           
  Lines       16475    16475           
=======================================
  Hits         1976     1976           
  Misses      14499    14499           
Components Coverage Δ
Parser test coverage 100.00% <ø> (ø)
AsciiDoc spec coverage 2.29% <ø> (ø)

@scouten scouten merged commit 9180f7e into main Jan 7, 2025
23 checks passed
@scouten scouten deleted the doc-formatting branch January 7, 2025 04:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant