Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for chapters 4-5 after native review. #496

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2020

Conversation

orchestr7
Copy link
Member

What's done:

  1. Script for generating code style file
  2. 6th chapter was not reviewed, so just a new file with this chapter is created

### What's done:
0) Script for generating code style file
1) 6th chapter was not reviewed, so just a new file with this chapter is created
@orchestr7 orchestr7 requested review from kentr0w and petertrr November 5, 2020 21:53
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #496 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #496   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     81.83%   81.83%           
  Complexity     1501     1501           
=========================================
  Files            71       71           
  Lines          3765     3765           
  Branches       1209     1209           
=========================================
  Hits           3081     3081           
  Misses          210      210           
  Partials        474      474           
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
unittests 81.83% <ø> (ø) 1501.00 <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a3b683...61408a8. Read the comment docs.

.sortedBy { it.nameWithoutExtension.replace(GUIDE_PATTERN, "").toInt() }
.map { it.readLines() }
.flatten()
.joinToString("\n")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
.joinToString("\n")
.joinToString(System.lineSeparator)

?

@orchestr7 orchestr7 merged commit 6f47a76 into master Nov 6, 2020
@petertrr petertrr deleted the feature/codestyle-4-5-6 branch November 6, 2020 13:06
@petertrr petertrr added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants