Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add retry loop to ctdb-must-have-node command #138

Conversation

phlogistonjohn
Copy link
Collaborator

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn commented Sep 3, 2024

I was shown a cluster that had failed to communicate with rados during the ctdb-must-have-node command, after it had at least correctly read "nothing".
Add a retry loop (with limit) to the command to make it robust against spurious errors.

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn force-pushed the jjm-robuster-ctdbmusthave branch from 1f958c8 to b267218 Compare September 3, 2024 14:24
@phlogistonjohn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Mergifyio rebase

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 4, 2024

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn force-pushed the jjm-robuster-ctdbmusthave branch from b267218 to 65c6ff7 Compare September 4, 2024 11:38
@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2024 11:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@anoopcs9 anoopcs9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

Copy link
Collaborator

@avanthakkar avanthakkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@phlogistonjohn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Mergifyio refresh

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 4, 2024

refresh

✅ Pull request refreshed

@phlogistonjohn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ok mergify whatever.

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn merged commit d61df07 into samba-in-kubernetes:master Sep 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn deleted the jjm-robuster-ctdbmusthave branch November 20, 2024 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants