Fixup build on qt > 5.14 #2
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There now being a bunch of -qt6 library versions on PRs, I'm not entirely sure should we go that direction everywhere and reintroduce two separate versions when we've just gotten rid of the qt4 leftovers. Also pondering how you are using this since the .spec is still qt5-only. Building with some alternative system?
Suppose the -qt6 vs -qt5 matters more when the different versions need to be parallel installable. At least on sailfish this is only needed by few system components so not sure yet if that parallel installability would be ever needed. Not a suggestion yet, just thinking aloud, but one alternative could be just renaming the whole thing as -qt. Or then uglier option could be to start by compiling the -qt5 library with qt 6.
For the qt 5.14 #ifdeffing I would have no objections. Could also just start by having that first.
Yeap for nemomobile |
No description provided.