bump executing to 2.2.0

[dimpase]

It's in particular needed to fix ipython error handling with Python 3.13
This will fix #39591

see #39591 (comment) by Tobias Diez

📝 Checklist

• The title is concise and informative.
• The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
• I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
• I have created tests covering the changes.
• I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

⌛ Dependencies

[dimpase]

@EmmanuelCharpentier - please review

[dimpase]

@jhpalmieri - please review

[jhpalmieri]

This builds for me with Python 3.12 and 3.13 on OS X, and it fixes some doctest failures. How is it on linux?

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

Le jeudi 27 février 2025 à 10:12 -0800, John H. Palmieri a écrit :

This builds for me with Python 3.12 and 3.13 on OS X, and it fixes some doctest failures. How is it on linux? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2]. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***> jhpalmierijhpalmieri left a comment (sagemath/sage#39602) [1] This builds for me with Python 3.12 and 3.13 on OS X, and it fixes some doctest failures. How is it on linux?

Ongoing... allow for a couple hours.

-- Emmanuel Charpentier

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2]. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[1] view it on GitHub #39602 (comment) [2] unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4WGTCFW3EGN5WCCMHU2J32R5ISTAVCNFSM6AAAAABYAOXLDCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBYG4ZTIOJRGM

[dimpase]

This builds for me with Python 3.12 and 3.13 on OS X, and it fixes some doctest failures. How is it on linux?

It's in distros, e.g. Gentoo has it, without any patches. It works on Gentoo for sure.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

With both 39602 and 39571, but without --enable-system-site-packages, building from clean stage (make distclean) fails : ======================================================================== Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all-start'): * package: cffi-1.15.1 last build time: 27 févr. 19:21 log file: /usr/local/sage-10/logs/pkgs/cffi-1.15.1.log * package: pillow-10.1.0 last build time: 27 févr. 19:21 log file: /usr/local/sage-10/logs/pkgs/pillow-10.1.0.log ======================================================================== Is it worth retrying *with* --enable-system-packages ?

…

-- Emmanuel Charpentier

----- Mail original -----

De: "Dima Pasechnik" ***@***.***> À: "sagemath/sage" ***@***.***> Cc: "EmmanuelCharpentier" ***@***.***>, "Mention" ***@***.***> Envoyé: Jeudi 27 Février 2025 19:02:56 Objet: Re: [sagemath/sage] bump executing to 2.2.0 (PR #39602) @jhpalmieri - please review — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: <sagemath/sage/pull/39602/c2688713040 @ github . com> dimpasedimpase left a comment (sagemath/sage#39602) @jhpalmieri - please review — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: <sagemath/sage/pull/39602/c2688713040 @ github . com>

[github-actions]

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 24a418e; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

With 39602, 39571 AND --enable-system-site-packages, after make-distclean, the compilation of pillow fails (log enclosed).

…

-- Emmanuel Charpentier

----- Mail original -----

De: "emm charpentier" ***@***.***> À: "sagemath/sage" ***@***.***> Cc: "Mention" ***@***.***>, "sagemath/sage" ***@***.***> Envoyé: Jeudi 27 Février 2025 19:36:14 Objet: Re: [sagemath/sage] bump executing to 2.2.0 (PR #39602) With both 39602 and 39571, but without --enable-system-site-packages, building from clean stage (make distclean) fails : ======================================================================== Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all-start'): * package: cffi-1.15.1 last build time: 27 févr. 19:21 log file: /usr/local/sage-10/logs/pkgs/cffi-1.15.1.log * package: pillow-10.1.0 last build time: 27 févr. 19:21 log file: /usr/local/sage-10/logs/pkgs/pillow-10.1.0.log ======================================================================== Is it worth retrying *with* --enable-system-packages ? -- Emmanuel Charpentier ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Dima Pasechnik" ***@***.***> > À: "sagemath/sage" ***@***.***> > Cc: "EmmanuelCharpentier" ***@***.***>, "Mention" > ***@***.***> > Envoyé: Jeudi 27 Février 2025 19:02:56 > Objet: Re: [sagemath/sage] bump executing to 2.2.0 (PR #39602) > > > > @jhpalmieri - please review > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: > <sagemath/sage/pull/39602/c2688713040 @ github . com> > dimpasedimpase left a comment (sagemath/sage#39602) > > @jhpalmieri - please review > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: > <sagemath/sage/pull/39602/c2688713040 @ github . com>

[dimpase]

your error messages say you either didn't do the update of Sages pillow and cffi, or did, but didn't run ./bootstrap && ./configure afterwards

[dimpase]

ping?

[dimpase]

Can we get this in - it's a trivial update. @vbraun

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

This patch, along #39571, allowed me to compile and run successfully 10.6.beta7 and 10.6.beta8, whose ptestlong gave acceptable results.

Notwithstanding the fact that I didn't give this patch any specific test (outside the vanishing of the initial errors), I set "positive review`. Feel free to amend this...