Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to numpy 2 in conda #39267

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

tobiasdiez
Copy link
Contributor

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez commented Jan 4, 2025

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

⌛ Dependencies

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez changed the title Conda-numpy-upgrade Upgrade to numpy 2 in conda Jan 4, 2025
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2025
5 tasks
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 18b9b80; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

@user202729
Copy link
Contributor

After this is merged, what's the plan for support of numpy < 2? (if yes we still need to test both somehow? The semantic for e.g. copy=False is slightly different)

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is done as part of #38749.

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez closed this Mar 7, 2025
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez deleted the conda-numpy-upgrade branch March 7, 2025 13:29
@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor

tornaria commented Mar 7, 2025

After this is merged, what's the plan for support of numpy < 2? (if yes we still need to test both somehow? The semantic for e.g. copy=False is slightly different)

Since numpy 1.26 is EOL on 17 Sep 2025, it may not be necessary to test it beyond sagemath 10.6.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants