-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More polynomials should know that they are irreducible #25227
Comments
Branch: u/saraedum/irreducible |
Changed branch from u/saraedum/irreducible to none |
Branch: u/saraedum/25227 |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Work Issues: docstrings |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
Changed work issues from docstrings to is the patchbot happy? |
comment:9
one doctest failing (typo) and pyflakes plugin is not happy |
Changed keywords from none to padicIMA |
comment:14
red branch => needs work |
Changed branch from u/saraedum/25227 to u/soehms/25227 |
comment:16
I rebase the implementation to 9.1.beta5 and insert a dependency to ticket #29266 which fixes a bug of #26421, since the latter one cause one of the doctest to fail. Note, that the following doctests of the present ticket already worked under the previous stable release 8.1:
Therefore, they don't make clear what is improved by the corresponding implementation. I would replace these doctests by examples which don't work without the implementation of the ticket. New commits:
|
Dependencies: #29266 |
Depends on #29266
Component: commutative algebra
Keywords: padicIMA
Work Issues: is the patchbot happy?
Author: Julian Rüth
Branch/Commit: u/soehms/25227 @
8977f19
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25227
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: