-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Better plotting for polytopes, re-add projection_direction #16625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:2
Even |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:4
Polyhedra have a |
comment:5
Yes, there was some confusion in my mind earlier... As to your comment on the ask.sagemath question, unfortunately the following is still in the documentation.
So if that is not supposed to be used in that way, it was missed whenever those methods changed. There is also no deprecation information given. |
Commit: |
New commits:
|
Author: Volker Braun |
comment:8
Wow, that is a lot more than need to fix this :-) It's gone beyond what I can comfortably review in a few minutes, but overall the structure, deprecations, and doc look like a big improvement. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:11
anybody feels like reviewing this? |
comment:12
Working on it. |
Reviewer: Andrey Novoseltsev |
comment:14
lgtm and works fine! New commits:
|
Changed branch from u/novoselt/projection_direction_broken_for_polytopes to |
comment:16
Just FYI, there was no doctesting of
followup will be part of #17247. |
Changed commit from |
From this ask.sagemath question, the two following should be different, but aren't.
CC: @dimpase @vbraun @novoselt
Component: geometry
Author: Volker Braun
Branch:
bdb1803
Reviewer: Andrey Novoseltsev
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16625
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: