Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust license of mechnically-reformed crates #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ctz
Copy link
Member

@ctz ctz commented Jan 20, 2025

Quite a while back these were produced from a MPL-2.0-licensed
file ("certdata.txt"). Now they are produced from the same data
published by Mozilla as part of the CCADB project.

CCADB data is provided under CDLA-2.0-Permissive, a copy of which
is included as LICENSE-CCADB here.

ref #87

Copy link
Member

@djc djc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess... Wonder if it's worth pushing on this upstream to see if they can't align with an existing license instead. I think the current setup means that everyone using cargo deny has to set an explicit hash to acknowledge the custom license, etc...

@ctz
Copy link
Member Author

ctz commented Jan 20, 2025

Wonder if it's worth pushing on this upstream to see if they can't align with an existing license instead.

I'll try this.

@ctz
Copy link
Member Author

ctz commented Jan 20, 2025

I'll try this.

▶️ mozilla/www.ccadb.org#188

Quite a while back these were produced from a MPL-2.0-licensed
file ("certdata.txt").  Now they are produced from the same data
published by Mozilla as part of the CCADB project.

CCADB data is provided under CDLA-2.0-Permissive, a copy of which
is included as `LICENSE-CCADB` here.
@ctz ctz force-pushed the jbp-ccadb-terms branch from c32fe9d to b02862c Compare February 4, 2025 09:19
@ctz
Copy link
Member Author

ctz commented Feb 4, 2025

Upstream have adopted CDLA-2.0-Permissive (whose terms we already follow, and has a SPDX short identifier), so I've updated this PR to match that.

@ctz ctz requested a review from cpu February 4, 2025 09:46
Copy link
Member

@cpu cpu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ctz ctz merged commit 90c48f3 into main Feb 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@ctz ctz deleted the jbp-ccadb-terms branch February 4, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants