-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct Fixes for Options and Results in Certain Contexts #96537
Conversation
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
// the suggestion format strangely, so we adjust the hi bound manually | ||
span.with_hi(span.hi() - BytePos(1)) | ||
} | ||
_ => span, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect that this case may never happen (as an Option or Result must always be unwraped, or expected, etc) but am not confident enough to make this a panic or some such. Can change at reviewer discretion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure, let's keep it as is.
(And set applicability to MaybeIncorrect
for this case.)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ impl LipogramCorpora { | |||
pub fn validate_all(&mut self) -> Result<(), char> { | |||
for selection in &self.selections { | |||
if selection.1.is_some() { | |||
if selection.1.as_ref().unwrap().contains(selection.0) { | |||
if selection.1.as_ref().as_mut().unwrap().contains(selection.0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how to stop it from doing this (applying both suggestions)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens if you use span_suggestion_verbose
twice instead of one span_suggestions
?
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ impl LipogramCorpora { | |||
pub fn validate_all(&mut self) -> Result<(), char> { | |||
for selection in &self.selections { | |||
if selection.1.is_some() { | |||
if selection.1.as_ref().unwrap().contains(selection.0) { | |||
if selection.1.as_ref().as_mut().unwrap().contains(selection.0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens if you use span_suggestion_verbose
twice instead of one span_suggestions
?
|
||
// Unfortunately the new span has a "." on the end which makes | ||
// the suggestion format strangely, so we adjust the hi bound manually | ||
span.with_hi(span.hi() - BytePos(1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it has .
on the end, then maybe we should suggest as_ref().
instead of .as_ref()
.
Span arithmetic is dangerous because macros can set spans arbitrarily and span - BytePos(1)
can potentially underflow or point into the middle of a unicode character producing an ICE.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good to me, I'll remove the span arithmetic. This + the previous suggestion gives the following output for issue-96438.rs
:
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `RefMut<'_, Option<Vec<()>>>`
--> ./src/test/ui/borrowck/issue-96438.rs:4:5
|
4 | cell.borrow_mut().unwrap().pop().unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ move occurs because value has type `Option<Vec<()>>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: consider borrowing the `Option`'s content
|
4 | cell.borrow_mut().as_ref().unwrap().pop().unwrap();
| +++++++++
help: consider borrowing the `Option`'s content
|
4 | cell.borrow_mut().as_mut().unwrap().pop().unwrap();
| +++++++++
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0507`.
Which is alright, however it doesn't seem to fix the double application in option-content-move.stderr
unfortunately.
// the suggestion format strangely, so we adjust the hi bound manually | ||
span.with_hi(span.hi() - BytePos(1)) | ||
} | ||
_ => span, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure, let's keep it as is.
(And set applicability to MaybeIncorrect
for this case.)
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #98066) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@George-lewis @rustbot label: +S-inactive |
Corrects the suggested fixes for Options and Results in certain contexts as mentioned in #96438.
The new code adjusts the span before applying the suggestion so that it's applied in the correct place, and also suggests both
.as_ref
and.as_mut
. There may be a way to analyze the use of the moved variable to determine which one is needed, but I hope that this is sufficient for now.Closes #96438