Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't exactly right: A
&str
is allowed to contain invalid utf-8, but other functions might assume that a&str
is valid utf-8, making a non-utf-8&str
very hard to safely use. But just calling this function with invalid utf-8 is, by itself, not unsafe.See also e.g. https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/string/struct.String.html#method.from_utf8_unchecked
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is true, but this is perhaps even handled just by if the validity of
&T
is independent from whether the pointee bytes are valid at typeT
.In general,
from_unchecked
functions do just say that it is UB to provide an argument which does not satisfy the safety invariant. This is useful, because it allows a sanitizing implementation of the function which checks the precondition.A postcondition of "is not used in any way which causes UB" is much more difficult to reason about.
Another point is that
str
has the option of using&*(v as *const [u8] as *const str)
to construct a&str
to invalid-UTF-8.String
doesn't have any such API, relying on conversion to/fromVec<u8>
.If any
str
/String
methods actually documented that they were safe to call with a reference to invalid UTF-8, then this weaker documentation requirement makes sense. As is, the only possible thing to do with astr
/String
to invalid UTF-8 is toforget
it. With that the case, the clearer precondition seems better to use.