Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Iterator traits implementations #8120

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Iterator traits implementations #8120

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented Jul 30, 2013

Implement RandomAccessIterator (RAI) where possible, for Iterator adaptors such as Map, Enumerate, Peek, Skip, Take, Cycle, where the adapted iterator is already RAI, and for collections where it is relevant (ringbuf and bitv).

After discussion with thestinger, remove the RAI impl for VecMutIterator, we cannot soundly provide mutable access with this trait.

Implement Extendable everywhere FromIterator is already implemented.

Fixes issue #8108.

@bluss
Copy link
Member Author

bluss commented Jul 30, 2013

thanks for the review

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2013
Implement RandomAccessIterator (RAI) where possible, for Iterator adaptors such as Map, Enumerate, Peek, Skip, Take, Cycle, where the adapted iterator is already RAI, and for collections where it is relevant (ringbuf and bitv).

After discussion with thestinger, remove the RAI impl for VecMutIterator, we cannot soundly provide mutable access with this trait.

Implement Extendable everywhere FromIterator is already implemented.

Fixes issue #8108.
@bors bors closed this Jul 30, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2022
trigger  `ptr_as_ptr` inside macros

This PR makes `ptr_as_ptr` trigger inside macros

Fixes issue rust-lang#8120

changelog: ``[`ptr_as_ptr`]`` is now triggered inside macros

r? `@llogiq`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants