Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolve: Fix an ICE in import validation #57160

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 12 additions & 6 deletions src/librustc_resolve/resolve_imports.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -223,19 +223,25 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
}

let check_usable = |this: &mut Self, binding: &'a NameBinding<'a>| {
if let Some(blacklisted_binding) = this.blacklisted_binding {
if ptr::eq(binding, blacklisted_binding) {
return Err((Determined, Weak::No));
}
}
// `extern crate` are always usable for backwards compatibility, see issue #37020,
// remove this together with `PUB_USE_OF_PRIVATE_EXTERN_CRATE`.
let usable = this.is_accessible(binding.vis) || binding.is_extern_crate();
if usable { Ok(binding) } else { Err((Determined, Weak::No)) }
};

if record_used {
return resolution.binding.ok_or((Determined, Weak::No)).and_then(|binding| {
return resolution.binding.and_then(|binding| {
// If the primary binding is blacklisted, search further and return the shadowed
// glob binding if it exists. What we really want here is having two separate
// scopes in a module - one for non-globs and one for globs, but until that's done
// use this hack to avoid inconsistent resolution ICEs during import validation.
if let Some(blacklisted_binding) = self.blacklisted_binding {
if ptr::eq(binding, blacklisted_binding) {
return resolution.shadowed_glob;
}
}
Some(binding)
}).ok_or((Determined, Weak::No)).and_then(|binding| {
if self.last_import_segment && check_usable(self, binding).is_err() {
Err((Determined, Weak::No))
} else {
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
// Nothing here
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/rust-2018/uniform-paths/issue-56596.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
// edition:2018
// compile-flags: --extern issue_56596
// aux-build:issue-56596.rs

#![feature(uniform_paths)]

mod m {
pub mod issue_56596 {}
}

use m::*;
use issue_56596; //~ ERROR `issue_56596` is ambiguous

fn main() {}
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/rust-2018/uniform-paths/issue-56596.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
error[E0659]: `issue_56596` is ambiguous (name vs any other name during import resolution)
--> $DIR/issue-56596.rs:12:5
|
LL | use issue_56596; //~ ERROR `issue_56596` is ambiguous
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ ambiguous name
|
= note: `issue_56596` could refer to an extern crate passed with `--extern`
= help: use `::issue_56596` to refer to this extern crate unambiguously
note: `issue_56596` could also refer to the module imported here
--> $DIR/issue-56596.rs:11:5
|
LL | use m::*;
| ^^^^
= help: use `crate::issue_56596` to refer to this module unambiguously

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0659`.