-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turn implied_outlives_bounds into a query #51959
Conversation
@tmandry oh, nice! This PR was a bit unexpected, but happy to have it! =) I did do some tests locally which suggest that the error reporting code is basically dead code (I added a |
Hmm, I had triggered it on one test, see #51649 (comment). This PR doesn’t actually make it a query, yet, btw :) |
f692035
to
4bcb7ff
Compare
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
4bcb7ff
to
24b795a
Compare
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
24b795a
to
02cf3ac
Compare
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #52021) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
02cf3ac
to
3794e27
Compare
Ugh. Rebased, but travis is reporting a new failure. On the bright side, this turns out to fix some other problems we were encountering (#52078) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
27a03db
to
86fa26b
Compare
@bors r+ |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #52476) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
These new errors actually seem a *tad* clearer than the old one, so that's good, but now there are 3. Maybe call it a wash?
86fa26b
to
0d8f3b3
Compare
Rebased. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 0d8f3b3 has been approved by |
…sakis Turn implied_outlives_bounds into a query Right now all this does is remove the error reporting in `implied_outlives_bounds`, which seems to work. Farming out full tests to Travis. For #51649. That issue is deferred so not sure what's next. r? @nikomatsakis
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Right now all this does is remove the error reporting in
implied_outlives_bounds
, which seems to work. Farming out full tests to Travis.For #51649. That issue is deferred so not sure what's next.
r? @nikomatsakis