Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc: Tweak exe allocator for MinGW/rumprun #31470

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Both of these targets have jemalloc disabled unconditionally right now, so using
maybe_jemalloc here isn't right. This fixes the case where a Linux compiler
(which is itself configured to use jemalloc) attempts to cross-compile to MinGW,
causing it to try to find an alloc_jemalloc crate (and failing).

Both of these targets have jemalloc disabled unconditionally right now, so using
`maybe_jemalloc` here isn't right. This fixes the case where a Linux compiler
(which is itself configured to use jemalloc) attempts to cross-compile to MinGW,
causing it to try to find an `alloc_jemalloc` crate (and failing).
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Aatch

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 7, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2016

📌 Commit 79a6373 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 79a6373 with merge 7fce503...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2016
Both of these targets have jemalloc disabled unconditionally right now, so using
`maybe_jemalloc` here isn't right. This fixes the case where a Linux compiler
(which is itself configured to use jemalloc) attempts to cross-compile to MinGW,
causing it to try to find an `alloc_jemalloc` crate (and failing).
@bors bors merged commit 79a6373 into rust-lang:master Feb 8, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the lets-find-jemalloc branch February 8, 2016 23:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants