Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for issue #17574 #18984

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2014
Merged

Fix for issue #17574 #18984

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2014

Conversation

sheroze1123
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #17574

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ fn lookup_method_for_for_loop(fcx: &FnCtxt,
let ty_string = fcx.infcx().ty_to_string(true_expr_type);
fcx.tcx().sess.span_err(iterator_expr.span,
format!("`for` loop expression has type `{}` which does \
not implement the `Iterator` trait",
not implement the `Iterator` trait: maybe try .iter()",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you change the : to a ; here? Otherwise, looks good, and thanks for the PR!

@bstrie
Copy link
Contributor

bstrie commented Nov 20, 2014

Thanks for the fix!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2014
@bors bors closed this Nov 21, 2014
@bors bors merged commit f3a33ab into rust-lang:master Nov 21, 2014
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
internal: Move dual blanket impl logic from source analyzer to goto_def
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve error message for "for x in [1,2,3] {"
5 participants