-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets #137324
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
67f0e6b
to
32a1ff1
Compare
These commits modify compiler targets. Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support cc @Noratrieb |
cool. @bors r+ rollup |
…6, r=workingjubilee Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets Rename target to be consistent with other Rust targets: Use `i686` instead of `i586` See also - rust-lang#136495 - rust-lang#109173 CC: `@jonathanpallant` `@japaric` `@gh-tr` `@samkearney`
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const EXCEPTIONS: &[&str] = &[ | |||
"xtensa_esp32s2_espidf", | |||
"xtensa_esp32s3_none_elf", | |||
"xtensa_esp32s3_espidf", | |||
"i586_pc_nto_qnx700", // Renamed to i686-pc-nto-qnx700, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136495 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this necessary? The old target is supposed to be gone, from the diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was necessary as otherwise the test and the end failed (I got the missing assembly test
error message).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe tidy uses the bootstrap rustc to determine the list of targets it expects tests for
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought so too but #137367 seems to work so
…kingjubilee Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131651 (Create a generic AVR target: avr-none) - rust-lang#136473 (infer linker flavor by linker name if it's sufficiently specific) - rust-lang#136608 (Pass through of target features to llvm-bitcode-linker and handling them) - rust-lang#136985 (Do not ignore uninhabited types for function-call ABI purposes. (Remove BackendRepr::Uninhabited)) - rust-lang#137192 (Remove obsolete Windows ThinLTO+TLS workaround) - rust-lang#137204 (Clarify MIR dialects and phases) - rust-lang#137270 (Fix `*-win7-windows-msvc` target since 26eeac1) - rust-lang#137298 (Check signature WF when lowering MIR body) - rust-lang#137299 (Simplify `Postorder` customization.) - rust-lang#137312 (Update references to cc_detect.rs) - rust-lang#137313 (Some codegen_llvm cleanups) - rust-lang#137318 (Workaround Cranelift not yet properly supporting vectors smaller than 128bit) - rust-lang#137322 (Update docs for default features of wasm targets) - rust-lang#137324 (Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…kingjubilee Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131651 (Create a generic AVR target: avr-none) - rust-lang#134340 (Stabilize `num_midpoint_signed` feature) - rust-lang#136473 (infer linker flavor by linker name if it's sufficiently specific) - rust-lang#136608 (Pass through of target features to llvm-bitcode-linker and handling them) - rust-lang#136985 (Do not ignore uninhabited types for function-call ABI purposes. (Remove BackendRepr::Uninhabited)) - rust-lang#137270 (Fix `*-win7-windows-msvc` target since 26eeac1) - rust-lang#137312 (Update references to cc_detect.rs) - rust-lang#137318 (Workaround Cranelift not yet properly supporting vectors smaller than 128bit) - rust-lang#137322 (Update docs for default features of wasm targets) - rust-lang#137324 (Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets) - rust-lang#137338 (skip submodule updating logics on tarballs) - rust-lang#137340 (Add a notice about missing GCC sources into source tarballs) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137324 - flba-eb:rename_qnx_target_name_i586, r=workingjubilee Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets Rename target to be consistent with other Rust targets: Use `i686` instead of `i586` See also - rust-lang#136495 - rust-lang#109173 CC: `@jonathanpallant` `@japaric` `@gh-tr` `@samkearney`
…r=jieyouxu Do not exempt nonexistent platforms from platform policy In rust-lang#137324 I approved the change of the i586-pc-qnx platform to i686 with this extra line included. I noticed it but thought it was a bootstrap problem of some sort. Nonetheless, removing this line doesn't seem to change anything. r? `@Noratrieb`
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137367 - workingjubilee:remove-stray-line, r=jieyouxu Do not exempt nonexistent platforms from platform policy In rust-lang#137324 I approved the change of the i586-pc-qnx platform to i686 with this extra line included. I noticed it but thought it was a bootstrap problem of some sort. Nonetheless, removing this line doesn't seem to change anything. r? `@Noratrieb`
Rename target to be consistent with other Rust targets: Use
i686
instead ofi586
See also
CC: @jonathanpallant @japaric @gh-tr @samkearney