Rollup of 3 pull requests

compiler/rustc_parse/src/lexer/mod.rs

@@ -69,24 +69,30 @@ pub(crate) fn lex_token_trees<'psess, 'src>(
         token: Token::dummy(),
         diag_info: TokenTreeDiagInfo::default(),
     };
-    let (_open_spacing, stream, res) = lexer.lex_token_trees(/* is_delimited */ false);
-    let unmatched_delims = lexer.diag_info.unmatched_delims;
-
-    if res.is_ok() && unmatched_delims.is_empty() {
-        Ok(stream)
-    } else {
-        // Return error if there are unmatched delimiters or unclosed delimiters.
-        // We emit delimiter mismatch errors first, then emit the unclosing delimiter mismatch
-        // because the delimiter mismatch is more likely to be the root cause of error
-        let mut buffer: Vec<_> = unmatched_delims
-            .into_iter()
-            .filter_map(|unmatched_delim| make_unclosed_delims_error(unmatched_delim, psess))
-            .collect();
-        if let Err(errs) = res {
-            // Add unclosing delimiter or diff marker errors
-            buffer.extend(errs);
+    let res = lexer.lex_token_trees(/* is_delimited */ false);
+
+    let mut unmatched_delims: Vec<_> = lexer
+        .diag_info
+        .unmatched_delims
+        .into_iter()
+        .filter_map(|unmatched_delim| make_unclosed_delims_error(unmatched_delim, psess))
+        .collect();
+
+    match res {
+        Ok((_open_spacing, stream)) => {
+            if unmatched_delims.is_empty() {
+                Ok(stream)
+            } else {
+                // Return error if there are unmatched delimiters or unclosed delimiters.
+                Err(unmatched_delims)
+            }
+        }
+        Err(errs) => {
+            // We emit delimiter mismatch errors first, then emit the unclosing delimiter mismatch
+            // because the delimiter mismatch is more likely to be the root cause of error
+            unmatched_delims.extend(errs);
+            Err(unmatched_delims)
         }
-        Err(buffer)
     }
 }
 

compiler/rustc_parse/src/lexer/tokentrees.rs

@@ -1,20 +1,18 @@
 use rustc_ast::token::{self, Delimiter, Token};
 use rustc_ast::tokenstream::{DelimSpacing, DelimSpan, Spacing, TokenStream, TokenTree};
 use rustc_ast_pretty::pprust::token_to_string;
-use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diag};
-use rustc_span::symbol::kw;
+use rustc_errors::Diag;
 
 use super::diagnostics::{report_suspicious_mismatch_block, same_indentation_level};
 use super::{Lexer, UnmatchedDelim};
-use crate::Parser;
 
 impl<'psess, 'src> Lexer<'psess, 'src> {
     // Lex into a token stream. The `Spacing` in the result is that of the
     // opening delimiter.
     pub(super) fn lex_token_trees(
         &mut self,
         is_delimited: bool,
-    ) -> (Spacing, TokenStream, Result<(), Vec<Diag<'psess>>>) {
+    ) -> Result<(Spacing, TokenStream), Vec<Diag<'psess>>> {
         // Move past the opening delimiter.
         let open_spacing = self.bump_minimal();
 
@@ -27,25 +25,25 @@ impl<'psess, 'src> Lexer<'psess, 'src> {
                     debug_assert!(!matches!(delim, Delimiter::Invisible(_)));
                     buf.push(match self.lex_token_tree_open_delim(delim) {
                         Ok(val) => val,
-                        Err(errs) => return (open_spacing, TokenStream::new(buf), Err(errs)),
+                        Err(errs) => return Err(errs),
                     })
                 }
                 token::CloseDelim(delim) => {
                     // Invisible delimiters cannot occur here because `TokenTreesReader` parses
                     // code directly from strings, with no macro expansion involved.
                     debug_assert!(!matches!(delim, Delimiter::Invisible(_)));
-                    return (
-                        open_spacing,
-                        TokenStream::new(buf),
-                        if is_delimited { Ok(()) } else { Err(vec![self.close_delim_err(delim)]) },
-                    );
+                    return if is_delimited {
+                        Ok((open_spacing, TokenStream::new(buf)))
+                    } else {
+                        Err(vec![self.close_delim_err(delim)])
+                    };
                 }
                 token::Eof => {
-                    return (
-                        open_spacing,
-                        TokenStream::new(buf),
-                        if is_delimited { Err(vec![self.eof_err()]) } else { Ok(()) },
-                    );
+                    return if is_delimited {
+                        Err(vec![self.eof_err()])
+                    } else {
+                        Ok((open_spacing, TokenStream::new(buf)))
+                    };
                 }
                 _ => {
                     // Get the next normal token.
@@ -107,10 +105,7 @@ impl<'psess, 'src> Lexer<'psess, 'src> {
         // Lex the token trees within the delimiters.
         // We stop at any delimiter so we can try to recover if the user
         // uses an incorrect delimiter.
-        let (open_spacing, tts, res) = self.lex_token_trees(/* is_delimited */ true);
-        if let Err(errs) = res {
-            return Err(self.unclosed_delim_err(tts, errs));
-        }
+        let (open_spacing, tts) = self.lex_token_trees(/* is_delimited */ true)?;
 
         // Expand to cover the entire delimited token tree.
         let delim_span = DelimSpan::from_pair(pre_span, self.token.span);
@@ -247,67 +242,6 @@ impl<'psess, 'src> Lexer<'psess, 'src> {
         this_spacing
     }
 
-    fn unclosed_delim_err(
-        &mut self,
-        tts: TokenStream,
-        mut errs: Vec<Diag<'psess>>,
-    ) -> Vec<Diag<'psess>> {
-        // If there are unclosed delims, see if there are diff markers and if so, point them
-        // out instead of complaining about the unclosed delims.
-        let mut parser = Parser::new(self.psess, tts, None);
-        let mut diff_errs = vec![];
-        // Suggest removing a `{` we think appears in an `if`/`while` condition.
-        // We want to suggest removing a `{` only if we think we're in an `if`/`while` condition,
-        // but we have no way of tracking this in the lexer itself, so we piggyback on the parser.
-        let mut in_cond = false;
-        while parser.token != token::Eof {
-            if let Err(diff_err) = parser.err_vcs_conflict_marker() {
-                diff_errs.push(diff_err);
-            } else if parser.is_keyword_ahead(0, &[kw::If, kw::While]) {
-                in_cond = true;
-            } else if matches!(
-                parser.token.kind,
-                token::CloseDelim(Delimiter::Brace) | token::FatArrow
-            ) {
-                // End of the `if`/`while` body, or the end of a `match` guard.
-                in_cond = false;
-            } else if in_cond && parser.token == token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace) {
-                // Store the `&&` and `let` to use their spans later when creating the diagnostic
-                let maybe_andand = parser.look_ahead(1, |t| t.clone());
-                let maybe_let = parser.look_ahead(2, |t| t.clone());
-                if maybe_andand == token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace) {
-                    // This might be the beginning of the `if`/`while` body (i.e., the end of the
-                    // condition).
-                    in_cond = false;
-                } else if maybe_andand == token::AndAnd && maybe_let.is_keyword(kw::Let) {
-                    let mut err = parser.dcx().struct_span_err(
-                        parser.token.span,
-                        "found a `{` in the middle of a let-chain",
-                    );
-                    err.span_suggestion(
-                        parser.token.span,
-                        "consider removing this brace to parse the `let` as part of the same chain",
-                        "",
-                        Applicability::MachineApplicable,
-                    );
-                    err.span_label(
-                        maybe_andand.span.to(maybe_let.span),
-                        "you might have meant to continue the let-chain here",
-                    );
-                    errs.push(err);
-                }
-            }
-            parser.bump();
-        }
-        if !diff_errs.is_empty() {
-            for err in errs {
-                err.cancel();
-            }
-            return diff_errs;
-        }
-        errs
-    }
-
     fn close_delim_err(&mut self, delim: Delimiter) -> Diag<'psess> {
         // An unexpected closing delimiter (i.e., there is no matching opening delimiter).
         let token_str = token_to_string(&self.token);

compiler/rustc_symbol_mangling/src/legacy.rs

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ use std::fmt::{self, Write};
 use std::mem::{self, discriminant};
 
 use rustc_data_structures::stable_hasher::{Hash64, HashStable, StableHasher};
-use rustc_hir::def_id::CrateNum;
+use rustc_hir::def_id::{CrateNum, DefId};
 use rustc_hir::definitions::{DefPathData, DisambiguatedDefPathData};
 use rustc_middle::bug;
 use rustc_middle::ty::print::{PrettyPrinter, Print, PrintError, Printer};
@@ -378,6 +378,33 @@ impl<'tcx> Printer<'tcx> for SymbolPrinter<'tcx> {
             Ok(())
         }
     }
+
+    fn print_impl_path(
+        &mut self,
+        impl_def_id: DefId,
+        args: &'tcx [GenericArg<'tcx>],
+        mut self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
+        mut impl_trait_ref: Option<ty::TraitRef<'tcx>>,
+    ) -> Result<(), PrintError> {
+        let mut typing_env = ty::TypingEnv::post_analysis(self.tcx, impl_def_id);
+        if !args.is_empty() {
+            typing_env.param_env =
+                ty::EarlyBinder::bind(typing_env.param_env).instantiate(self.tcx, args);
+        }
+
+        match &mut impl_trait_ref {
+            Some(impl_trait_ref) => {
+                assert_eq!(impl_trait_ref.self_ty(), self_ty);
+                *impl_trait_ref = self.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(typing_env, *impl_trait_ref);
+                self_ty = impl_trait_ref.self_ty();
+            }
+            None => {
+                self_ty = self.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(typing_env, self_ty);
+            }
+        }
+
+        self.default_print_impl_path(impl_def_id, args, self_ty, impl_trait_ref)
+    }
 }
 
 impl<'tcx> PrettyPrinter<'tcx> for SymbolPrinter<'tcx> {

src/bootstrap/src/utils/cc_detect.rs

@@ -44,6 +44,16 @@ fn cc2ar(cc: &Path, target: TargetSelection) -> Option<PathBuf> {
         Some(PathBuf::from("ar"))
     } else if target.contains("vxworks") {
         Some(PathBuf::from("wr-ar"))
+    } else if target.contains("-nto-") {
+        if target.starts_with("i586") {
+            Some(PathBuf::from("ntox86-ar"))
+        } else if target.starts_with("aarch64") {
+            Some(PathBuf::from("ntoaarch64-ar"))
+        } else if target.starts_with("x86_64") {
+            Some(PathBuf::from("ntox86_64-ar"))
+        } else {
+            panic!("Unknown architecture, cannot determine archiver for Neutrino QNX");
+        }
     } else if target.contains("android") || target.contains("-wasi") {
         Some(cc.parent().unwrap().join(PathBuf::from("llvm-ar")))
     } else {

tests/ui/parser/brace-in-let-chain.rs

@@ -3,15 +3,15 @@
 #![feature(let_chains)]
 fn main() {
     if let () = ()
-        && let () = () { //~ERROR: found a `{` in the middle of a let-chain
+        && let () = () {
         && let () = ()
     {
     }
 }
 
 fn quux() {
     while let () = ()
-        && let () = () { //~ERROR: found a `{` in the middle of a let-chain
+        && let () = () {
         && let () = ()
     {
     }

tests/ui/parser/brace-in-let-chain.stderr

@@ -27,33 +27,5 @@ LL |     }
 LL | }
    |                                                     ^
 
-error: found a `{` in the middle of a let-chain
-  --> $DIR/brace-in-let-chain.rs:14:24
-   |
-LL |         && let () = () {
-   |                        ^
-LL |         && let () = ()
-   |         ------ you might have meant to continue the let-chain here
-   |
-help: consider removing this brace to parse the `let` as part of the same chain
-   |
-LL -         && let () = () {
-LL +         && let () = ()
-   |
-
-error: found a `{` in the middle of a let-chain
-  --> $DIR/brace-in-let-chain.rs:6:24
-   |
-LL |         && let () = () {
-   |                        ^
-LL |         && let () = ()
-   |         ------ you might have meant to continue the let-chain here
-   |
-help: consider removing this brace to parse the `let` as part of the same chain
-   |
-LL -         && let () = () {
-LL +         && let () = ()
-   |
-
-error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

tests/ui/parser/diff-markers/unclosed-delims-in-macro.rs

@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
+// The diff marker detection was removed for this example, because it relied on
+// the lexer having a dependency on the parser, which was horrible.
+
 macro_rules! foo {
 <<<<<<< HEAD
-    //~^ ERROR encountered diff marker
     () {
 =======
     () { //
 >>>>>>> 7a4f13c blah blah blah
     }
-}
+} //~ this file contains an unclosed delimiter

tests/ui/parser/diff-markers/unclosed-delims-in-macro.stderr

@@ -1,23 +1,16 @@
-error: encountered diff marker
-  --> $DIR/unclosed-delims-in-macro.rs:2:1
+error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
+  --> $DIR/unclosed-delims-in-macro.rs:11:48
    |
+LL | macro_rules! foo {
+   |                  - unclosed delimiter
 LL | <<<<<<< HEAD
-   | ^^^^^^^ between this marker and `=======` is the code that we're merging into
+LL |     () {
+   |        - this delimiter might not be properly closed...
 ...
-LL | =======
-   | ------- between this marker and `>>>>>>>` is the incoming code
-LL |     () { //
-LL | >>>>>>> 7a4f13c blah blah blah
-   | ^^^^^^^ this marker concludes the conflict region
-   |
-   = note: conflict markers indicate that a merge was started but could not be completed due to merge conflicts
-           to resolve a conflict, keep only the code you want and then delete the lines containing conflict markers
-   = help: if you're having merge conflicts after pulling new code:
-           the top section is the code you already had and the bottom section is the remote code
-           if you're in the middle of a rebase:
-           the top section is the code being rebased onto and the bottom section is the code coming from the current commit being rebased
-   = note: for an explanation on these markers from the `git` documentation:
-           visit <https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Advanced-Merging#_checking_out_conflicts>
+LL | }
+   | -                                             ^
+   | |
+   | ...as it matches this but it has different indentation
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

tests/ui/parser/diff-markers/unclosed-delims.rs

@@ -1,18 +1,12 @@
+// The diff marker detection was removed for this example, because it relied on
+// the lexer having a dependency on the parser, which was horrible.
+
 mod tests {
     #[test]
 <<<<<<< HEAD
-//~^ ERROR encountered diff marker
-//~| NOTE between this marker and `=======`
-
-//~| NOTE conflict markers indicate that
-//~| HELP if you're having merge conflicts
-//~| NOTE for an explanation on these markers
-
     fn test1() {
 =======
-//~^ NOTE between this marker and `>>>>>>>`
     fn test2() {
 >>>>>>> 7a4f13c blah blah blah
-//~^ NOTE this marker concludes the conflict region
     }
-}
+} //~ this file contains an unclosed delimiter