-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions #112014
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax
May 27, 2023
Merged
rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions #112014
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax
May 27, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
May 27, 2023
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
notriddle
force-pushed
the
notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax
branch
from
May 27, 2023 01:31
282540e
to
7a571d8
Compare
Fixes rust-lang#110111 This bug, and the workaround in this commit, is closely linked to [pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441], getting offsets of link components. In particular, pulldown-cmark doesn't provide the offsets of the contents of a link. To work around this, rustdoc parser parts of a link definition itself. [pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441]: pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441
notriddle
force-pushed
the
notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax
branch
from
May 27, 2023 01:38
7a571d8
to
1a77d9a
Compare
Thanks for taking over! I got too frustrated trying to fix this |
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
May 27, 2023
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 27, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111936 (Include test suite metadata in the build metrics) - rust-lang#111952 (Remove DesugaringKind::Replace.) - rust-lang#111966 (Add #[inline] to array TryFrom impls) - rust-lang#111983 (Perform MIR type ops locally in new solver) - rust-lang#111997 (Fix re-export of doc hidden macro not showing up) - rust-lang#112014 (rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #110111
This bug, and the workaround in this PR, is closely linked to raphlinus/pulldown-cmark#441, getting offsets of link components. In particular, pulldown-cmark doesn't provide the offsets of the contents of a link.
To work around this, rustdoc parser parts of a link definition itself.