Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove dependency on gnustl_shared for android builds #10949

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bors bors closed this Dec 14, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
[`manual_filter_map`]: lint on `matches` and pattern matching

Fixes rust-lang#8010

Previously this lint only worked specifically for a very limited set of methods on the filter call (`.filter(|opt| opt.is_some())` and `.filter(|res| res.is_ok())`). This PR extends it to also recognize `matches!` in the `filter` and pattern matching with `if let` or `match` in the `map`.

Example:
```rs
enum Enum {
  A(i32),
  B,
}

let _ = [Enum::A(123), Enum::B].into_iter()
  .filter(|x| matches!(x, Enum::A(_)))
  .map(|x| if let Enum::A(s) = x { s } else { unreachable!() });
```
Now suggests:
```diff
-  .filter(|x| matches!(x, Enum::A(_))).map(if let Enum::A(s) = x { s } else { unreachable!() })
+  .filter_map(|x| match x { Enum::A(s) => Some(s), _ => None })
```

Adding this required a somewhat large change in code because it originally seemed to be specifically written with only method calls in the filter in mind, and `matches!` has different behavior in the map, so this new setup should make it possible to support more "generic" cases that need different handling for the filter and map calls.

changelog: [`manual_filter_map`]: lint on `matches` and pattern matching (and some internal refactoring)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants