Make functional record update/struct update syntax works inside closu…

…res when feature capture_disjoint_fields is enabled

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/as_place.rs

@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ impl<'tcx> PlaceBuilder<'tcx> {
         self.base
     }
 
-    fn field(self, f: Field, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self {
+    crate fn field(self, f: Field, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self {
         self.project(PlaceElem::Field(f, ty))
     }
 

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/into.rs

@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
                 let field_names = this.hir.all_fields(adt_def, variant_index);
 
                 let fields: Vec<_> = if let Some(FruInfo { base, field_types }) = base {
-                    let base = unpack!(block = this.as_place(block, base));
+                    let place_builder = unpack!(block = this.as_place_builder(block, base));
 
                     // MIR does not natively support FRU, so for each
                     // base-supplied field, generate an operand that
@@ -312,9 +312,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
                         .zip(field_types.into_iter())
                         .map(|(n, ty)| match fields_map.get(&n) {
                             Some(v) => v.clone(),
-                            None => this.consume_by_copy_or_move(
-                                this.hir.tcx().mk_place_field(base, n, ty),
-                            ),
+                            None => {
+                                let place_builder = place_builder.clone();
+                                this.consume_by_copy_or_move(
+                                    place_builder
+                                        .field(n, ty)
+                                        .into_place(this.hir.tcx(), this.hir.typeck_results()),
+                                )
+                            },
                         })
                         .collect()
                 } else {

src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/run_pass/fru_syntax.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// run-pass
+
+// Test that functional record update/struct update syntax works inside
+// a closure when the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled.
+
+#![feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]
+//~^ WARNING: the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is incomplete
+//~| NOTE: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
+//~| NOTE: see issue #53488 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53488>
+
+struct S {
+    a: String,
+    b: String,
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    let a = String::new();
+    let b = String::new();
+    let s = S {a, b};
+
+    let c = || {
+        let s2 = S {
+            a: format!("New a"),
+            ..s
+        };
+        println!("{} {}", s2.a, s2.b);
+    };
+
+    c();
+}

src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/run_pass/fru_syntax.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+warning: the feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
+  --> $DIR/fru_syntax.rs:6:12
+   |
+LL | #![feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]
+   |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
+   = note: see issue #53488 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53488> for more information
+
+warning: 1 warning emitted
+