Do not remove semicolon if it changes the block type #14103
Merged
+43
−13
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removing the semicolon of the last statement of an expressionless block may change the block type even if the statement's type is `()`. If the block type is `!` because of a systematic early return, typing it as `()` may make it incompatible with the expected type for the block (to which `!` is cast).
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
dswij
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removing the semicolon of the last statement of an expressionless block may change the block type even if the statement's type is
(). If the block type is!because of a systematic early return, typing it as()may make it incompatible with the expected type for the block (to which!is cast).Fix #14100
changelog: [
unnecessary_semicolon]: do not remove semicolon if it could change the block type from!to()