Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark unnecessary_first_then_check and byte_char_slices as Applicable #13537

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@Manishearth Manishearth commented Oct 11, 2024

I don't really see situations where this isn't Applicable that aren't weird edge cases where the lint should be disabled.

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 11, 2024

r? @xFrednet

rustbot has assigned @xFrednet.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 11, 2024
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

LGTM,thanks!


Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Suggestions are applicable,
run rustfix now

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

📌 Commit 42723dc has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 42723dc with merge 48e98ec...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 48e98ec to master...

@bors bors merged commit 48e98ec into rust-lang:master Oct 11, 2024
8 checks passed
@Manishearth Manishearth deleted the applicable branch October 11, 2024 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants