Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rustup #13157

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

Rustup #13157

merged 19 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @ghost

changelog: none

flip1995 and others added 16 commits July 11, 2024 15:44
This will allow lowering const params to a dedicated enum variant, rather
than to an `AnonConst` that is later examined during `ty` lowering.
This is a very large commit since a lot needs to be changed in order to
make the tests pass. The salient changes are:

- `ConstArgKind` gets a new `Path` variant, and all const params are now
  represented using it. Non-param paths still use `ConstArgKind::Anon`
  to prevent this change from getting too large, but they will soon use
  the `Path` variant too.

- `ConstArg` gets a distinct `hir_id` field and its own variant in
  `hir::Node`. This affected many parts of the compiler that expected
  the parent of an `AnonConst` to be the containing context (e.g., an
  array repeat expression). They have been changed to check the
  "grandparent" where necessary.

- Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in
  rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some
  cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which
  has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess
  whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't
  know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free
  const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const
  param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we
  decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path
  consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`.

- We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than
  implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the
  addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`.

- Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the
  most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate
  errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable
  feature and is now tracked at #127009.
Represent type-level consts with new-and-improved `hir::ConstArg`

### Summary

This is a step toward `min_generic_const_exprs`. We now represent all const
generic arguments using an enum that differentiates between const *paths*
(temporarily just bare const params) and arbitrary anon consts that may perform
computations. This will enable us to cleanly implement the `min_generic_const_args`
plan of allowing the use of generics in paths used as const args, while
disallowing their use in arbitrary anon consts. Here is a summary of the salient
aspects of this change:

- Add `current_def_id_parent` to `LoweringContext`

  This is needed to track anon const parents properly once we implement
  `ConstArgKind::Path` (which requires moving anon const def-creation
  outside of `DefCollector`).

- Create `hir::ConstArgKind` enum with `Path` and `Anon` variants. Use it in the
  existing `hir::ConstArg` struct, replacing the previous `hir::AnonConst` field.

- Use `ConstArg` for all instances of const args. Specifically, use it instead
  of `AnonConst` for assoc item constraints, array lengths, and const param
  defaults.

- Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in
  rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some
  cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which
  has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess
  whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't
  know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free
  const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const
  param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we
  decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path
  consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`.

- We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than
  implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the
  addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`.

- Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the
  most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate
  errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable
  feature and is now tracked at rust-lang/rust#127009.

### Followup items post-merge

- Use `ConstArgKind::Path` for all const paths, not just const params.
- Fix (no github dont close this issue) #127009
- If a path in generic args doesn't resolve as a type, try to resolve as a const
  instead (do this in rustc_resolve). Then remove the special-casing from
  `rustc_ast_lowering`, so that all params will automatically be lowered as
  `ConstArgKind::Path`.
- (?) Consider making `const_evaluatable_unchecked` a hard error, or at least
  trying it in crater

r? `@BoxyUwU`
Remove unnecessary impl sorting in queries and metadata

Removes unnecessary impl sorting because queries already return their keys in HIR definition order: rust-lang/rust#120371 (comment)

r? `@cjgillot` or `@lcnr` -- unless I totally misunderstood what was being asked for here? 😆

fixes #120371
Make ast `MutVisitor` have the same method name and style as `Visitor`

It doesn't map 100% because some `MutVisitor` methods can filter or even expand to multiple items, but consistency seems nicer.

tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#127615
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 25, 2024
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 25, 2024

📌 Commit 71b0f0f has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 25, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 71b0f0f with merge 37f4fbb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 25, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 37f4fbb to master...

@bors bors merged commit 37f4fbb into rust-lang:master Jul 25, 2024
8 checks passed
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the rustup branch July 25, 2024 16:46
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2024
…r=dswij

`missing_trait_methods`: lint methods in definition order

Lintcheck for #13157 showed a bunch of changes for `missing_trait_methods`

This is because `values_sorted` was sorting the entries by the key's [`DefPathHash`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_span/def_id/struct.DefPathHash.html), this is stable for a given compiler but can change across versions

changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants