Mention syntax ambiguity for eRFC 2947. #437
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Centril
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2018
Havvy
previously requested changes
Oct 2, 2018
src/expressions/if-expr.md
Outdated
| @@ -111,6 +111,27 @@ match EXPR { | |||
| } | |||
| ``` | |||
|
|
|||
| If the expression is a [lazy boolean operator expression][_LazyBooleanOperatorExpression_] then | |||
| this is a error as it is ambiguous which is problematic for the implementation | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd leave out the "which is problematic". Just state it's ambiguous with a planned future change in the language.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of rust-lang/rust#53668.
cc @Centril