Unrolled build for rust-lang#135873

Rollup merge of rust-lang#135873 - Zalathar:be-prepared, r=oli-obk

coverage: Prepare for upcoming changes to counter creation

This is a collection of smaller changes to coverage instrumentation code that have been extracted from a larger PR that I'm still working on, in order to hopefully make review easier.

Each individual change should hopefully be mostly self-explanatory. One of the big goals of the upcoming PR will be to defer certain parts of counter-creation until codegen, via the query system, so that ends up being a recurring theme in these changes. Several of the changes are follow-ups to rust-lang#135481.

There should be no observable change in compiler output.

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/coverageinfo/mapgen/covfun.rs

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ pub(crate) fn prepare_covfun_record<'tcx>(
     is_used: bool,
 ) -> Option<CovfunRecord<'tcx>> {
     let fn_cov_info = tcx.instance_mir(instance.def).function_coverage_info.as_deref()?;
-    let ids_info = tcx.coverage_ids_info(instance.def);
+    let ids_info = tcx.coverage_ids_info(instance.def)?;
 
     let expressions = prepare_expressions(fn_cov_info, ids_info, is_used);
 

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/coverageinfo/mod.rs

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ use rustc_codegen_ssa::traits::{
 use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxIndexSet};
 use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::CoverageKind;
 use rustc_middle::ty::Instance;
-use rustc_middle::ty::layout::HasTyCtxt;
 use tracing::{debug, instrument};
 
 use crate::builder::Builder;
@@ -147,6 +146,10 @@ impl<'tcx> CoverageInfoBuilderMethods<'tcx> for Builder<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
             debug!("function has a coverage statement but no coverage info");
             return;
         };
+        let Some(ids_info) = bx.tcx.coverage_ids_info(instance.def) else {
+            debug!("function has a coverage statement but no IDs info");
+            return;
+        };
 
         // Mark the instance as used in this CGU, for coverage purposes.
         // This includes functions that were not partitioned into this CGU,
@@ -162,8 +165,7 @@ impl<'tcx> CoverageInfoBuilderMethods<'tcx> for Builder<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
                 // be smaller than the number originally inserted by the instrumentor,
                 // if some high-numbered counters were removed by MIR optimizations.
                 // If so, LLVM's profiler runtime will use fewer physical counters.
-                let num_counters =
-                    bx.tcx().coverage_ids_info(instance.def).num_counters_after_mir_opts();
+                let num_counters = ids_info.num_counters_after_mir_opts();
                 assert!(
                     num_counters as usize <= function_coverage_info.num_counters,
                     "num_counters disagreement: query says {num_counters} but function info only has {}",

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use std::fmt::{self, Debug, Formatter};
 
 use rustc_index::IndexVec;
 use rustc_index::bit_set::DenseBitSet;
-use rustc_macros::{HashStable, TyDecodable, TyEncodable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable};
+use rustc_macros::{HashStable, TyDecodable, TyEncodable};
 use rustc_span::Span;
 
 rustc_index::newtype_index! {
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ impl ConditionId {
 /// Enum that can hold a constant zero value, the ID of an physical coverage
 /// counter, or the ID of a coverage-counter expression.
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub enum CovTerm {
     Zero,
     Counter(CounterId),
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ impl Debug for CovTerm {
     }
 }
 
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub enum CoverageKind {
     /// Marks a span that might otherwise not be represented in MIR, so that
     /// coverage instrumentation can associate it with its enclosing block/BCB.
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ impl Debug for CoverageKind {
 }
 
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, HashStable)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable)]
 pub enum Op {
     Subtract,
     Add,
@@ -168,15 +168,15 @@ impl Op {
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct Expression {
     pub lhs: CovTerm,
     pub op: Op,
     pub rhs: CovTerm,
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub enum MappingKind {
     /// Associates a normal region of code with a counter/expression/zero.
     Code(CovTerm),
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ impl MappingKind {
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct Mapping {
     pub kind: MappingKind,
     pub span: Span,
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ pub struct Mapping {
 /// to be used in conjunction with the individual coverage statements injected
 /// into the function's basic blocks.
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct FunctionCoverageInfo {
     pub function_source_hash: u64,
     pub body_span: Span,
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ pub struct FunctionCoverageInfo {
 /// ("Hi" indicates that this is "high-level" information collected at the
 /// THIR/MIR boundary, before the MIR-based coverage instrumentation pass.)
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct CoverageInfoHi {
     /// 1 more than the highest-numbered [`CoverageKind::BlockMarker`] that was
     /// injected into the MIR body. This makes it possible to allocate per-ID
@@ -252,23 +252,23 @@ pub struct CoverageInfoHi {
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct BranchSpan {
     pub span: Span,
     pub true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
     pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
 }
 
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct ConditionInfo {
     pub condition_id: ConditionId,
     pub true_next_id: Option<ConditionId>,
     pub false_next_id: Option<ConditionId>,
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct MCDCBranchSpan {
     pub span: Span,
     pub condition_info: ConditionInfo,
@@ -277,14 +277,14 @@ pub struct MCDCBranchSpan {
 }
 
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct DecisionInfo {
     pub bitmap_idx: u32,
     pub num_conditions: u16,
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
-#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
+#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)]
 pub struct MCDCDecisionSpan {
     pub span: Span,
     pub end_markers: Vec<BlockMarkerId>,

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/mod.rs

@@ -358,6 +358,8 @@ pub struct Body<'tcx> {
     ///
     /// Only present if coverage is enabled and this function is eligible.
     /// Boxed to limit space overhead in non-coverage builds.
+    #[type_foldable(identity)]
+    #[type_visitable(ignore)]
     pub coverage_info_hi: Option<Box<coverage::CoverageInfoHi>>,
 
     /// Per-function coverage information added by the `InstrumentCoverage`
@@ -366,6 +368,8 @@ pub struct Body<'tcx> {
     ///
     /// If `-Cinstrument-coverage` is not active, or if an individual function
     /// is not eligible for coverage, then this should always be `None`.
+    #[type_foldable(identity)]
+    #[type_visitable(ignore)]
     pub function_coverage_info: Option<Box<coverage::FunctionCoverageInfo>>,
 }
 

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs

@@ -417,7 +417,14 @@ pub enum StatementKind<'tcx> {
     ///
     /// Interpreters and codegen backends that don't support coverage instrumentation
     /// can usually treat this as a no-op.
-    Coverage(CoverageKind),
+    Coverage(
+        // Coverage statements are unlikely to ever contain type information in
+        // the foreseeable future, so excluding them from TypeFoldable/TypeVisitable
+        // avoids some unhelpful derive boilerplate.
+        #[type_foldable(identity)]
+        #[type_visitable(ignore)]
+        CoverageKind,
+    ),
 
     /// Denotes a call to an intrinsic that does not require an unwind path and always returns.
     /// This avoids adding a new block and a terminator for simple intrinsics.

compiler/rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs

@@ -618,7 +618,9 @@ rustc_queries! {
     /// Summarizes coverage IDs inserted by the `InstrumentCoverage` MIR pass
     /// (for compiler option `-Cinstrument-coverage`), after MIR optimizations
     /// have had a chance to potentially remove some of them.
-    query coverage_ids_info(key: ty::InstanceKind<'tcx>) -> &'tcx mir::coverage::CoverageIdsInfo {
+    ///
+    /// Returns `None` for functions that were not instrumented.
+    query coverage_ids_info(key: ty::InstanceKind<'tcx>) -> Option<&'tcx mir::coverage::CoverageIdsInfo> {
         desc { |tcx| "retrieving coverage IDs info from MIR for `{}`", tcx.def_path_str(key.def_id()) }
         arena_cache
     }

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/counters.rs

@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{CounterId, CovTerm, Expression, ExpressionId,
 
 use crate::coverage::counters::balanced_flow::BalancedFlowGraph;
 use crate::coverage::counters::iter_nodes::IterNodes;
-use crate::coverage::counters::node_flow::{CounterTerm, MergedNodeFlowGraph, NodeCounters};
+use crate::coverage::counters::node_flow::{
+    CounterTerm, NodeCounters, make_node_counters, node_flow_data_for_balanced_graph,
+};
 use crate::coverage::graph::{BasicCoverageBlock, CoverageGraph};
 
 mod balanced_flow;
@@ -27,20 +29,20 @@ pub(super) fn make_bcb_counters(
 ) -> CoverageCounters {
     // Create the derived graphs that are necessary for subsequent steps.
     let balanced_graph = BalancedFlowGraph::for_graph(graph, |n| !graph[n].is_out_summable);
-    let merged_graph = MergedNodeFlowGraph::for_balanced_graph(&balanced_graph);
+    let node_flow_data = node_flow_data_for_balanced_graph(&balanced_graph);
 
     // Use those graphs to determine which nodes get physical counters, and how
     // to compute the execution counts of other nodes from those counters.
-    let nodes = make_node_counter_priority_list(graph, balanced_graph);
-    let node_counters = merged_graph.make_node_counters(&nodes);
+    let priority_list = make_node_flow_priority_list(graph, balanced_graph);
+    let node_counters = make_node_counters(&node_flow_data, &priority_list);
 
     // Convert the counters into a form suitable for embedding into MIR.
     transcribe_counters(&node_counters, bcb_needs_counter)
 }
 
 /// Arranges the nodes in `balanced_graph` into a list, such that earlier nodes
 /// take priority in being given a counter expression instead of a physical counter.
-fn make_node_counter_priority_list(
+fn make_node_flow_priority_list(
     graph: &CoverageGraph,
     balanced_graph: BalancedFlowGraph<&CoverageGraph>,
 ) -> Vec<BasicCoverageBlock> {
@@ -81,11 +83,11 @@ fn transcribe_counters(
     let mut new = CoverageCounters::with_num_bcbs(bcb_needs_counter.domain_size());
 
     for bcb in bcb_needs_counter.iter() {
-        // Our counter-creation algorithm doesn't guarantee that a counter
-        // expression starts or ends with a positive term, so partition the
+        // Our counter-creation algorithm doesn't guarantee that a node's list
+        // of terms starts or ends with a positive term, so partition the
         // counters into "positive" and "negative" lists for easier handling.
         let (mut pos, mut neg): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) =
-            old.counter_expr(bcb).iter().partition_map(|&CounterTerm { node, op }| match op {
+            old.counter_terms[bcb].iter().partition_map(|&CounterTerm { node, op }| match op {
                 Op::Add => Either::Left(node),
                 Op::Subtract => Either::Right(node),
             });