Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consolidate test protos to spec/support/protos #283

Conversation

nerdrew
Copy link
Contributor

@nerdrew nerdrew commented Jan 27, 2016

  • add SUPPORT_PATH, PROTOS_PATH helpers in specs
  • refresh unittest protos from upstream

- add SUPPORT_PATH, PROTOS_PATH helpers in specs
- refresh unittest protos from upstream
repeated TestAllTypes ext1 = 1000;
repeated TestAllTypes ext2 = 1001;
}
required TestAllTypes required_all_types = 1;
optional TestAllTypes optional_all_types = 2;
repeated TestAllTypes repeated_all_types = 3;
// TODO: Support groups
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are groups supported? or should this remain commented out?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm. Strange. It is able to read the proto and the generated code looks right. Lemme dig up the protobuf docs on group.

Leaving it as is. It seems to work fine.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool 😎

abrandoned added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2016
…tream

consolidate test protos to spec/support/protos
@abrandoned abrandoned merged commit 9d84055 into ruby-protobuf:master Feb 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants