chore/fix: destroy pool in the plugin/pipeline.Int fix #130
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rustatian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Pipeline
participant WorkersPool
User->>Pipeline: Create Pipeline
Pipeline->>WorkersPool: Initialize Workers
Pipeline->>Pipeline: Handle Int and Priority
Pipeline->>WorkersPool: Stop
WorkersPool->>WorkersPool: Cleanup Resources
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
pipeline.go (2)
90-111: Enhanced Type Handling inIntMethodThe modifications to the
Intmethod significantly improve its ability to handle various data types. The use of a type switch to accommodate strings and different integer types is a robust solution. However, consider adding a comment explaining the choice ofstrconv.ParseIntwith a base of 10 and a bit size of 64, as this might not be immediately clear to all developers.
205-226: Improved Flexibility inPriorityMethodThe updates to the
Prioritymethod align well with the changes in theIntmethod, enhancing the handling of various data types. The method's ability to parse strings and handle different integer types ensures that it can accommodate a wider range of input configurations. Consider adding a similar comment as suggested for theIntmethod to maintain consistency and clarity across the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (4)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- pipeline.go (5 hunks)
- plugin.go (1 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- go.mod
- tests/go.mod
Additional comments not posted (1)
plugin.go (1)
223-230: Proper cleanup of worker pools implemented.The addition of a deferred function to stop the worker pool is a good practice. The use of mutex ensures thread safety, which is crucial in concurrent environments. However, it's important to verify that the context passed to the
Destroymethod is handled correctly to avoid potential deadlocks or excessive blocking.Run the following script to verify the context handling and potential deadlocks:
Verification successful
Context handling in
Destroymethod is robust.The
Destroymethod inplugin.gocorrectly uses a context with a timeout to prevent indefinite blocking during the driver stop operation. The context is canceled after use, ensuring proper resource management. This implementation effectively mitigates potential deadlocks and handles contexts appropriately.
- The method spans lines 544 to 575 in
plugin.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context handling and potential deadlocks in the `Destroy` method. # Test: Search for the `Destroy` method usage. Expect: Proper context handling and no potential deadlocks. rg --type go -A 5 $'Destroy'Length of output: 4524
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `Destroy` method for detailed analysis. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (p *Plugin) Destroy(ctx context.Context, $_) $_' --debugLength of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the command to extract the implementation of the `Destroy` method for detailed analysis. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (p *Plugin) Destroy(ctx context.Context, $_) $_' --debug-queryLength of output: 1480
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
Reason for This PR
ref: roadrunner-server/roadrunner#1986
close: roadrunner-server/roadrunner#2000
Description of Changes
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Pipelinemethods, allowing for greater flexibility with input types.Pluginstruct to ensure proper cleanup of the workers' pool.Bug Fixes
Documentation