chore: add include test #63
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on dependency management and configuration settings. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant ConfigManager
Client->>ConfigManager: Request Configuration
ConfigManager->>Server: Load Configuration
Server-->>ConfigManager: Return Configuration
ConfigManager-->>Client: Send Configuration
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/go.mod (2)
Line range hint
3-5: Invalid Go version specifiedThe file specifies Go 1.23 which doesn't exist yet (latest stable version is 1.22). This will cause build failures.
Apply this diff to update to the latest stable version:
-go 1.23 +go 1.22 -toolchain go1.23.3 +toolchain go1.22.1
57-61: Consider documenting OpenTelemetry integrationNew OpenTelemetry dependencies suggest observability features are being added. This is a significant architectural change that should be documented.
Consider:
- Adding documentation about the observability features
- Providing examples of how to configure OpenTelemetry
- Documenting any performance implications
tests/plugin_test.go (2)
628-642: Remove commented-out code.This block of commented code should be removed as it's not providing any value and could confuse future maintainers.
711-711: Consider making the sleep duration configurable.The hardcoded sleep duration could be made configurable through a constant or test parameter for better maintainability.
- time.Sleep(time.Second * 1) + const testWaitDuration = time.Second + time.Sleep(testWaitDuration)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
go.mod(1 hunks)tests/configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml(1 hunks)tests/configs/include1/.rr.yaml(1 hunks)tests/go.mod(3 hunks)tests/plugin_test.go(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- go.mod
- tests/configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml
- tests/configs/include1/.rr.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/go.mod (2)
11-15: Verify version compatibility between RoadRunner components
Let's verify that the versions of RoadRunner components are compatible:
- kv/v5 v5.1.0
- memory/v5 v5.1.0
- server/v5 v5.1.2
✅ Verification successful
All RoadRunner v5.x.x components are compatible
The versions of RoadRunner components in use are all from the same major version (v5) and are compatible with each other:
- All components follow semantic versioning
- The components are using recent minor versions (v5.0.x - v5.1.x)
- The go.mod shows these components are being used together successfully in tests
- No version conflicts or compatibility issues are present in the dependency tree
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version compatibility between RoadRunner components
# Look for any version constraints or compatibility issues in go.mod files of these components
# Check go.mod files of each component for their dependencies
for pkg in "kv" "memory" "server"; do
echo "Checking $pkg dependencies..."
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/${pkg}/v5/go.mod" | grep "roadrunner-server"
done
Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the local go.mod file for any version constraints or compatibility requirements
cat go.mod
# Also check if there are any version-related issues or constraints mentioned in documentation
fd -e md | xargs rg -i "version|compatibility" -A 2 -B 2
# Look for any error patterns or version-related issues in test files
fd -e go -t f | xargs rg "(?i)(version|compatibility).*(error|issue|fail)" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the tests/go.mod file for any specific version constraints or requirements
cat tests/go.mod
# Look for any version-related imports or dependencies in the test files
fd -t f -e go -p "tests" | xargs rg "roadrunner-server" -A 2 -B 2
# Check if there are any version-specific test configurations
fd -t f -p "tests" | xargs rg "v5\." -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 7753
27-27: Verify system requirements for new monitoring dependencies
The addition of system monitoring packages (gopsutil, go-sysconf, go-ole) may require specific permissions or OS capabilities. Please ensure:
- Documentation covers any new system requirements
- Error handling gracefully handles permission issues
- Cross-platform compatibility is maintained (especially for go-ole which is Windows-specific)
Also applies to: 52-53, 56-56
tests/plugin_test.go (2)
14-14: LGTM: New imports align with test requirements.
The added imports for kv, memory, and server packages are consistent with the test changes and maintain version consistency (v5).
Also applies to: 16-16, 18-18
646-671: LGTM: Test implementation properly validates include functionality.
The test effectively:
- Configures and registers all necessary plugins
- Validates the included configuration values
- Follows the standard RoadRunner plugin test pattern
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/plugin_test.go (3)
627-629: Add descriptive comments for the test scenario.Consider adding comments to explain:
- The specific issue being tested (#2017)
- The expected behavior of config inclusion
- The relationship between the included configs
Also applies to: 630-634
695-695: Replace hardcoded sleep with a more reliable mechanism.Using a fixed sleep duration might lead to flaky tests. Consider using a more reliable approach:
- Use a retry mechanism with timeout
- Implement a readiness check
- Use a channel-based notification system
Example implementation:
-time.Sleep(time.Second * 1) +// Wait for server readiness with timeout +timeout := time.After(5 * time.Second) +ticker := time.NewTicker(100 * time.Millisecond) +defer ticker.Stop() +for { + select { + case <-timeout: + t.Fatal("timeout waiting for server to be ready") + case <-ticker.C: + if cfg.Has("kv.roadrunner.driver") && cfg.Has("rpc.listen") { + return + } + } +}
672-678: Enhance error messages in assertions.The error messages in the failure cases could be more descriptive to help with debugging.
-assert.Fail(t, "error", e.Error.Error()) +assert.Fail(t, "unexpected error from container serve", e.Error.Error())
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/plugin_test.go(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/plugin_test.go (3)
14-14: LGTM! New imports are consistent and necessary.
The added imports for kv, memory, and server packages are required for the new test case and follow the project's import conventions.
Also applies to: 16-16, 18-18
636-644: LGTM! Plugin registration is comprehensive.
The test properly registers all necessary plugins for testing the configuration inclusion feature.
651-655: LGTM! Clear assertions with specific checks.
The test verifies both the presence and values of key configuration entries:
- KV driver configuration
- RPC listener configuration
| ExperimentalFeatures: true, | ||
| Path: "configs/.rr.include2.yaml", | ||
| Version: "2023.3.4", | ||
| Path: "configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing test configuration file
The test configuration file configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml referenced in tests/plugin_test.go is missing from the repository. This file is required for the test to function properly as it's used in the configuration setup.
tests/plugin_test.go: The test expects a configuration file atconfigs/include1/.rr-include.yamlbut this file does not exist in the repository.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the test configuration files.
Ensure that the referenced configuration files exist and contain the expected values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of test configuration files
# Check if the config file exists
if ! [ -f "configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml" ]; then
echo "Error: Test configuration file not found"
exit 1
fi
# Check for required configuration keys
rg -A 2 "kv:" configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml
rg -A 2 "rpc:" configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the directory structure exists and list all yaml files
fd -e yaml -e yml
# Also check if there are any test files that might reference this config
rg -l "configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml" tests/
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file to understand the context of this config file
rg -B 5 -A 5 "configs/include1/.rr-include.yaml" tests/plugin_test.go
# Also check if there are any fixtures or test data directories
fd -t d "fixtures|testdata"
Length of output: 346
Reason for This PR
ref: roadrunner-server/roadrunner#2017
Description of Changes
includecasesLicense Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation