Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update jest monorepo #281

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2022
Merged

chore(deps): update jest monorepo #281

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 28, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/jest (source) 29.2.0 -> 29.2.2 age adoption passing confidence
jest (source) 29.2.1 -> 29.3.1 age adoption passing confidence
jest-circus 29.2.1 -> 29.3.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

facebook/jest

v29.3.1

Compare Source

Fixes
  • [jest-config] Do not warn about preset in ProjectConfig #​13583
Performance
  • [jest-transform] Defer creation of cache directory #​13420

v29.3.0

Compare Source

Features
  • [jest-runtime] Support WebAssembly (Wasm) imports in ESM modules (#​13505)
Fixes
  • [jest-config] Add config validation for projects option (#​13565)
  • [jest-mock] Treat cjs modules as objects so they can be mocked (#​13513)
  • [jest-worker] Throw an error instead of hanging when jest workers terminate unexpectedly (#​13566)
Chore & Maintenance
  • [@jest/transform] Update convert-source-map (#​13509)
  • [docs] Mention toStrictEqual in UsingMatchers docs. (#​13560)

v29.2.2

Compare Source

Fixes
  • [@jest/test-sequencer] Make sure sharding does not produce empty groups (#​13476)
  • [jest-circus] Test marked as todo are shown as todo when inside a focussed describe (#​13504)
  • [jest-mock] Ensure mock resolved and rejected values are promises from correct realm (#​13503)
  • [jest-snapshot] Don't highlight passing asymmetric property matchers in snapshot diff (#​13480)
Chore & Maintenance
  • [docs] Update link to Jest 28 upgrade guide in error message (#​13483)
  • [jest-runner, jest-watcher] Update emittery (#​13490)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 21:00 on friday,every weekend" in timezone Asia/Tokyo, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from 7b6e632 to 55d5460 Compare November 1, 2022 03:53
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update jest monorepo to v29.2.2 chore(deps): update jest monorepo Nov 1, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from 55d5460 to 28cb2cc Compare November 4, 2022 18:10
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update jest monorepo chore(deps): update jest monorepo to v29.2.2 Nov 4, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from 28cb2cc to ce2cbf9 Compare November 7, 2022 22:21
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update jest monorepo to v29.2.2 chore(deps): update jest monorepo Nov 7, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 70b9f1a to 21ba4b2 Compare November 9, 2022 16:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from 21ba4b2 to 70bc293 Compare November 9, 2022 16:49
@rinchsan rinchsan merged commit b478ee6 into main Nov 10, 2022
@rinchsan rinchsan deleted the renovate/jest-monorepo branch November 10, 2022 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant