Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

COO-117: fix: remove invalid owner ref on cluster role #460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

@simonpasquier simonpasquier commented Apr 17, 2024

Cluster roles aren't namespace-scoped and can't have namespace-scoped owner references.

Closes COO-117

Cluster roles aren't namespace-scoped and can't have namespace-scoped
owner references.

Closes COO-117

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2024

@simonpasquier: This pull request references COO-117 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Cluster roles aren't namespace-scoped and can't have namespace-scoped owner references.

Closes COO-117

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2024

@simonpasquier: This pull request references COO-117 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Cluster roles aren't namespace-scoped and can't have namespace-scoped owner references.

Closes COO-117

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@simonpasquier simonpasquier marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2024 15:40
@simonpasquier simonpasquier requested a review from a team as a code owner April 17, 2024 15:40
@simonpasquier simonpasquier requested review from sthaha and slashpai and removed request for a team April 17, 2024 15:40
@danielmellado
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@@ -39,6 +38,7 @@ func (r Updater) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, c client.Client, scheme *runtime
r.resource.GetNamespace(), r.resource.GetName(),
r.resource.GetObjectKind().GroupVersionKind().String(), err)
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks also for this style clean up. I'll try to have that automatically applied for the whole project ;)

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fc12c57 into rhobs:main Apr 17, 2024
11 checks passed
@simonpasquier simonpasquier deleted the coo-117 branch April 18, 2024 08:31
simonpasquier added a commit to simonpasquier/observability-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
simonpasquier added a commit to simonpasquier/observability-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants