Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add example for running remark with lint plugin #44

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pcgilday
Copy link
Contributor

@pcgilday pcgilday commented Feb 3, 2016

  • Specifies that using remarkrc lint plugin does not require -u flag

@pcgilday
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcgilday commented Feb 3, 2016

Did not change the .remarkrc example as getting the same output in both examples makes it clearer that these do the same thing - IMO.

@wooorm
Copy link
Member

wooorm commented Feb 3, 2016

I'm on mobile, but I think the extra line is failing travis!

- Specifies that using remarkrc lint plugin does not require -u flag
@pcgilday pcgilday force-pushed the configure-remark-lint branch from fda8f25 to 935e484 Compare February 3, 2016 20:28
@pcgilday
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcgilday commented Feb 3, 2016

Yeah, I just pushed the fix.

@wooorm
Copy link
Member

wooorm commented Feb 3, 2016

Thanks, I’m reviewing it as we speak!

@wooorm wooorm closed this in 34d19b4 Feb 3, 2016
@wooorm wooorm added the 🦋 type/enhancement This is great to have label Feb 3, 2016
@wooorm
Copy link
Member

wooorm commented Feb 3, 2016

Thanks! I included a tiny change to the .remarkrc too, so that it actually affect the output. Great work! 👍

@wooorm wooorm added ⛵️ status/released 📚 area/docs This affects documentation labels Aug 15, 2019
@wooorm wooorm added the 💪 phase/solved Post is done label Aug 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 area/docs This affects documentation 💪 phase/solved Post is done 🦋 type/enhancement This is great to have
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants